An engineer configures uRPF loose mode on an interface that is part of an IPv6 network with multiple equal-cost paths to the same destination via different interfaces. The router receives traffic from a source that is reachable via one of the paths, but the traffic arrives on a different interface. The traffic is dropped. Which is the most likely explanation?
Trap 1: The router has 'ipv6 uRPF strict' configured instead of loose, but…
Incorrect. The configuration is loose mode.
Trap 2: The equal-cost paths cause the routing table to have multiple…
Incorrect. uRPF loose mode works with multiple paths; it just needs any entry.
Trap 3: The interface has an IPv6 ACL that denies the traffic before uRPF…
Incorrect. ACLs are applied before uRPF, but the question implies uRPF is the cause.
- A
The source address is a link-local address (fe80::), which is not installed in the global routing table, causing uRPF loose mode to drop the packet.
Correct. Link-local addresses are not in the routing table, so uRPF loose mode drops them.
- B
The router has 'ipv6 uRPF strict' configured instead of loose, but the show command indicates loose.
Why wrong: Incorrect. The configuration is loose mode.
- C
The equal-cost paths cause the routing table to have multiple entries, and uRPF loose mode requires a single best path.
Why wrong: Incorrect. uRPF loose mode works with multiple paths; it just needs any entry.
- D
The interface has an IPv6 ACL that denies the traffic before uRPF is applied.
Why wrong: Incorrect. ACLs are applied before uRPF, but the question implies uRPF is the cause.