Question 416 of 2,152
OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3)hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the route was redistributed into OSPF by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric of 20. This is correct because the Type 5 LSA output explicitly shows the Advertising Router as 3.3.3.3, the Metric Type as 2 (E2), and the Metric value as 20, which together confirm that the external prefix 5.5.5.5/32 was injected into OSPF through redistribution rather than learned via an OSPF neighbor. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this tests your ability to interpret OSPF external LSAs, specifically distinguishing between E1 and E2 metrics—a common trap is forgetting that E2 metrics do not add internal path cost, so the advertised metric remains 20 regardless of how far the route travels. A key memory tip is that a Forward Address of 0.0.0.0 means the next hop is the advertising router itself, simplifying path selection. Remember: “E2 stays true, E1 adds the view.”

300-410 OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ospf troubleshooting (v2/v3). The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot OSPF route redistribution:

R1# show ip ospf database external 5.5.5.5

OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)

Type-5 AS External Link States

LS age: 120 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC, Upward) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 5.5.5.5 (External Network Number) Advertising Router: 3.3.3.3 LS Seq Number: 80000001 Checksum: 0xABCD Length: 36 Network Mask: /32 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 20 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0

What does this output indicate?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The route was redistributed into OSPF by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric of 20.

The output shows an OSPF Type 5 External LSA for prefix 5.5.5.5/32, advertised by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric type E2 and metric 20.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The prefix 5.5.5.5/32 is a network inside the OSPF domain.

    Why it's wrong here

    Type 5 LSAs are for external routes redistributed into OSPF.

  • The route was redistributed into OSPF by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric of 20.

    Why this is correct

    The LSA is Type-5, advertising router is 3.3.3.3, metric type E2 with metric 20.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The forward address indicates the next-hop is 5.5.5.5.

    Why it's wrong here

    The forward address is 0.0.0.0, meaning the next-hop is the advertising router.

  • This is a Type 4 Summary ASBR LSA.

    Why it's wrong here

    The LS Type is AS External Link, which is Type 5.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — This question tests OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The route was redistributed into OSPF by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric of 20. — The output shows an OSPF Type 5 External LSA for prefix 5.5.5.5/32, advertised by router 3.3.3.3 with a metric type E2 and metric 20.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.