Question 265 of 2,152
MPLS OperationshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct interpretation is that the LDP session with 10.0.0.2 failed due to malformed messages from the neighbor. When debugging LDP errors, the output specifically shows “malformed hello” and “malformed initialization” messages, which indicate that the received packets violate the LDP protocol format or contain unexpected parameters. This is a critical concept for the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, where you must distinguish between session failures caused by authentication issues, transport problems, or malformed messages. A common trap is to assume the neighbor is unreachable, but the debug clearly shows the packets are received yet rejected due to corruption or misconfiguration—often pointing to a software bug or mismatched LDP parameters on the remote router. For the exam, remember that “malformed” always points to the content of the message itself, not the connectivity. A helpful memory tip: “Malformed means the message is formed wrong, not the neighbor gone.”

300-410 MPLS Operations Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of mpls operations. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command to debug MPLS LDP errors:

R1# debug mpls ldp errors

Output:

*Mar  1 00:01:23.456: LDP: Received malformed hello from 10.0.0.2
*Mar  1 00:01:23.789: LDP: Received malformed initialization from 10.0.0.2
*Mar  1 00:01:24.012: LDP: Session with 10.0.0.2:0 (0x1234) is DOWN

What does this output indicate?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full MPLS explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The LDP session with 10.0.0.2 failed due to malformed messages from the neighbor

The debug output shows LDP errors. R1 received malformed hello and initialization messages from neighbor 10.0.0.2, causing the LDP session to go down. This indicates a configuration mismatch or software bug on the neighbor.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The LDP session with 10.0.0.2 failed due to malformed messages from the neighbor

    Why this is correct

    Malformed messages were received, leading to session teardown.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The LDP session with 10.0.0.2 is up and stable

    Why it's wrong here

    The session went DOWN.

  • R1 is sending malformed messages to 10.0.0.2

    Why it's wrong here

    The errors indicate received malformed messages, not sent.

  • The LDP session is using incorrect transport address

    Why it's wrong here

    The error is about malformed messages, not transport address.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

MPLS Operations — This question tests MPLS Operations — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The LDP session with 10.0.0.2 failed due to malformed messages from the neighbor — The debug output shows LDP errors. R1 received malformed hello and initialization messages from neighbor 10.0.0.2, causing the LDP session to go down. This indicates a configuration mismatch or software bug on the neighbor.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.