A service provider is deploying EVPN-VPWS to replace legacy pseudowire connections for point-to-point Layer 2 services. They notice that MAC addresses learned from a CE device are not properly advertised to the remote PE. Which EVPN route type is responsible for advertising MAC address reachability information in a VPWS scenario?
Trap 1: Route Type 1 (Ethernet Auto-Discovery)
Ethernet Auto-Discovery (Route Type 1) does not advertise MAC addresses; it carries ESI and label information for service discovery.
Trap 2: Route Type 5 (IP Prefix)
IP Prefix (Route Type 5) is for advertising IP prefixes, not MAC addresses.
Trap 3: Route Type 3 (Inclusive Multicast)
Inclusive Multicast (Route Type 3) is used for multicast tunnel membership, not MAC reachability.
- A
Route Type 1 (Ethernet Auto-Discovery)
Why wrong: Ethernet Auto-Discovery (Route Type 1) does not advertise MAC addresses; it carries ESI and label information for service discovery.
- B
Route Type 2 (MAC/IP Advertisement)
MAC/IP Advertisement (Route Type 2) is the route type used to advertise MAC address reachability in EVPN, including for VPWS when MAC learning is enabled.
- C
Route Type 5 (IP Prefix)
Why wrong: IP Prefix (Route Type 5) is for advertising IP prefixes, not MAC addresses.
- D
Route Type 3 (Inclusive Multicast)
Why wrong: Inclusive Multicast (Route Type 3) is used for multicast tunnel membership, not MAC reachability.