Courseiva
ServiceshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-501 Services Practice Question

Exhibit

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0
 ipv4 address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
 service-policy output QOS_POLICY
!
class-map match-any REALTIME
 match precedence 5
 match dscp ef
!
policy-map QOS_POLICY
 class REALTIME
  priority level 1
  police rate percent 10
 class class-default
  bandwidth remaining ratio 1

Refer to the exhibit. A service provider is applying this QoS policy on a PE-CE interface. The business customer complains that voice traffic (marked with DSCP EF) experiences drops during congestion. What is the likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the distinction between priority queuing (which provides low latency) and policing (which enforces a rate limit), leading candidates to overlook that a police rate in a priority class can cause drops even when the priority queue is not congested.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The police rate under the REALTIME class is limiting voice traffic to 10% of bandwidth.

The REALTIME class uses the 'police' command to enforce a rate of 10% of the interface bandwidth. When voice traffic marked DSCP EF exceeds this policed rate, packets are dropped, even though the class is configured with priority queuing. The police rate is the bottleneck, not the priority queue itself.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The police rate under the REALTIME class is limiting voice traffic to 10% of bandwidth.

    Why this is correct

    Policing drops traffic exceeding 10%.

  • The priority level is set too low; voice should be priority level 4.

    Why it's wrong here

    Priority level only affects the order of multiple priority queues; level 1 is highest.

  • The 'bandwidth remaining ratio' command under class-default is starving the priority queue.

    Why it's wrong here

    The priority queue is not affected by bandwidth remaining ratio.

  • The policy is applied in the output direction; it should be input.

    Why it's wrong here

    Output direction is correct for shaping/policing egress traffic.

About these practice questions

This 350-501 question is part of Courseiva's 971-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.