A service provider is deploying MPLS L3VPN over an OSPF backbone. The PE routers are configured with OSPF as the IGP. The CE router of customer A is connected to two PEs for redundancy. Which configuration is required on the PE routers to ensure that the CE router can load-balance traffic across both PEs without loops?
Trap 1: Use OSPF sham-links between the two PEs.
Sham-links are used to connect backdoor links across an MPLS VPN, not for CE-PE loop prevention.
Trap 2: Use the BGP cost community to adjust the path selection on the CE.
BGP cost community influences BGP path selection, but does not prevent routing loops in OSPF.
Trap 3: Disable the DN-bit on the PE-CE OSPF interface.
Disabling the DN-bit would allow loopback routes to be propagated, potentially causing loops.
- A
Use OSPF sham-links between the two PEs.
Why wrong: Sham-links are used to connect backdoor links across an MPLS VPN, not for CE-PE loop prevention.
- B
Use the BGP cost community to adjust the path selection on the CE.
Why wrong: BGP cost community influences BGP path selection, but does not prevent routing loops in OSPF.
- C
Configure OSPF with the capability vrf-lite and enable the down-bit on the PE-CE link.
The down-bit prevents the CE from re-advertising routes learned from one PE to the other PE, avoiding loops.
- D
Disable the DN-bit on the PE-CE OSPF interface.
Why wrong: Disabling the DN-bit would allow loopback routes to be propagated, potentially causing loops.