Courseiva
NetworkingeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-501 Networking Practice Question

Exhibit

show bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUSTOMER 10.1.1.0/24
BGP routing table entry for 10.1.1.0/24, version 5
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
  Network: 10.1.1.0/24
  Path: 100
    from 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, external, best
      Extended Community: RT:200:1

Refer to the exhibit. The VRF CUSTOMER is configured with route-target import 100:1. Why is this route not installed in the VRF table?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the distinction between route distinguisher (RD) and route-target (RT) — candidates confuse RD uniqueness with RT import/export matching, leading them to pick 'Route distinguisher missing' when the actual issue is a route-target mismatch.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Route target mismatch.

B is correct because the VRF CUSTOMER is configured with route-target import 100:1, but the route in question carries a different route-target value (e.g., 100:2). For a route to be installed into a VRF table, the route-target extended community attached to the route must match at least one of the import route-targets configured on the VRF. A mismatch prevents the route from being imported, even if other conditions are satisfied.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • VRF not properly configured.

    Why it's wrong here

    The VRF is configured, but import target mismatch prevents installation.

  • Route target mismatch.

    Why this is correct

    The route carries RT:200:1, but the VRF imports only RT:100:1.

  • Route distinguisher missing.

    Why it's wrong here

    RD is present (implicitly in the route); it does not affect import filtering.

  • Next-hop unreachable.

    Why it's wrong here

    There is no indication that the next-hop is unreachable.

About these practice questions

This 350-501 question is part of Courseiva's 971-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.