Question 311 of 500
NetworkinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the next-hop is not resolved for IPv6. In MP-BGP for IPv6, when OSPFv3 internal routes are redistributed into BGP, the next-hop address is typically set to the router’s own IPv6 address; however, if that address is a link-local address or is not present in the global IPv6 unicast routing table, iBGP peers cannot reach it and will not install or advertise the routes. This concept is frequently tested on the Cisco SPCOR / CCNP Service Provider Core 350-501 exam, often as a trap where candidates assume redistribution alone is sufficient—overlooking that BGP requires a resolvable, global-scope next-hop for iBGP propagation. A common memory tip is “BGP won’t advertise what it can’t reach,” so always verify that the next-hop is both global and present in the routing table.

350-501 Networking Practice Question

This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of networking. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A service provider uses MP-BGP with IPv6 address family. They notice that routes redistributed from OSPFv3 are not being advertised to iBGP peers. The OSPF routes are internal. What is a likely reason?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The next-hop is not resolved for IPv6.

In MP-BGP for IPv6, the next-hop address for iBGP peers must be reachable via an IPv6 route in the global routing table or the appropriate VRF. When OSPFv3 redistributes internal routes into BGP, the next-hop is often set to the OSPFv3 router's own IPv6 address; if that address is not reachable (e.g., because the interface is not in the IPv6 unicast routing table or the next-hop is link-local), iBGP peers will not install the routes. This is a common cause of routes being learned but not advertised to iBGP peers.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The network command is missing under IPv6 address family.

    Why it's wrong here

    Network command is used for originating routes, not for redistribution.

  • The bgp default ipv4-unicast command is disabled.

    Why it's wrong here

    This command affects IPv4 unicast address family activation, not IPv6.

  • The next-hop is not resolved for IPv6.

    Why this is correct

    If the BGP next-hop for the redistributed routes is not reachable via the IPv6 routing table, BGP will not advertise them to iBGP peers.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The routes are not in the IPv6 unicast table.

    Why it's wrong here

    If redistributed, routes should be in the IPv6 table; this is not the common issue.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often assume the issue is with the network command or the IPv4 unicast default, but the real problem is the IPv6 next-hop reachability, which is a subtle but critical requirement for MP-BGP IPv6 route propagation.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Network command is used for originating routes, not for redistribution.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In MP-BGP, the next-hop for IPv6 routes must be a global unicast address that is reachable via the IPv6 routing table. When redistributing OSPFv3 routes, BGP may set the next-hop to the OSPFv3 router's own IPv6 address; if that address is a link-local address or is not in the global routing table, iBGP peers will reject the route because the next-hop is unresolved. This is often resolved by using the 'next-hop-self' command under the IPv6 address family or by ensuring the next-hop is a global unicast address that is reachable.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 350-501 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-501 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-501 question test?

Networking — This question tests Networking — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The next-hop is not resolved for IPv6. — In MP-BGP for IPv6, the next-hop address for iBGP peers must be reachable via an IPv6 route in the global routing table or the appropriate VRF. When OSPFv3 redistributes internal routes into BGP, the next-hop is often set to the OSPFv3 router's own IPv6 address; if that address is not reachable (e.g., because the interface is not in the IPv6 unicast routing table or the next-hop is link-local), iBGP peers will not install the routes. This is a common cause of routes being learned but not advertised to iBGP peers.

What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.