During a security incident, it is observed that a server behind a Cisco ASA is being accessed repeatedly with different source IPs in a short time. The firewall logs show many dropped packets to the server's IP on port 443. What is the most effective mitigation to reduce the impact while maintaining legitimate access?
Trap 1: Increase the connection timeout
Increasing timeout may worsen the impact by holding more table entries.
Trap 2: Implement an access-list to allow only known source IPs
Unknown sources would be legitimate users, so this is impractical.
Trap 3: Configure a static route to null0 for the server's IP
Null routing drops all traffic to that IP, including legitimate.
- A
Increase the connection timeout
Why wrong: Increasing timeout may worsen the impact by holding more table entries.
- B
Implement an access-list to allow only known source IPs
Why wrong: Unknown sources would be legitimate users, so this is impractical.
- C
Configure a static route to null0 for the server's IP
Why wrong: Null routing drops all traffic to that IP, including legitimate.
- D
Enable TCP Intercept with a low threshold
TCP Intercept mitigates SYN floods by intercepting and verifying connections.