Courseiva
Endpoint Protection and DetectionhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-701 Endpoint Protection and Detection Practice Question

A security analyst is investigating a malware incident on an endpoint protected by Cisco AMP for Endpoints. The Device Trajectory shows that a file named 'invoice.exe' was detonated from a USB drive. The file's cloud verdict was 'Unknown' at the time of execution. The analyst sees that the file spawned multiple child processes that made outbound connections to a malicious IP. The AMP policy has 'Exploit Prevention' enabled but 'File Reputation' is set to 'Monitor' only. The analyst wants to prevent similar incidents in the future without blocking legitimate applications. Which action should the analyst recommend?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Change the File Reputation setting to 'Block' for files with 'Unknown' disposition.

Changing the File Reputation setting to 'Block' for files with 'Unknown' disposition would prevent unknown files like 'invoice.exe' from executing in the future, while still allowing files with known good reputations. This balances security with usability. Option A (blocking all USB execution via Group Policy) is too restrictive as it would block legitimate applications from removable media. Option B (enabling all Exploit Prevention rules) targets exploit techniques, not malware executables like 'invoice.exe'. Option C (adding the hash to a global blacklist) is reactive and would only block that specific hash, not similar unknown files.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Block all execution of applications from removable media via Group Policy.

    Why it's wrong here

    Overly restrictive; impacts legitimate use.

  • Enable all Exploit Prevention rules, including those for script-based attacks.

    Why it's wrong here

    The file was not an exploit; it was malware.

  • Add the SHA256 hash of 'invoice.exe' to the global blacklist.

    Why it's wrong here

    Only blocks that specific variant, not future unknown malware.

  • Change the File Reputation setting to 'Block' for files with 'Unknown' disposition.

    Why this is correct

    Prevents execution of unknown files while allowing known good files.

About these practice questions

This 350-701 question is part of Courseiva's 978-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-701 exam.