A network engineer is troubleshooting a Cisco IOS-XE router that hosts multiple virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) instances. Users in VRF-A report they cannot reach a server in VRF-B. The engineer verifies that both VRFs have the correct routes and that the router has a route leaking configuration using route-target import/export. However, connectivity still fails. What is the most likely cause?
Trap 1: The router does not have iBGP configured between the VRFs.
iBGP is not required for route leaking between VRFs on the same router; route-target import/export operates without BGP.
Trap 2: The router is using VRF-lite, which does not support route leaking.
VRF-lite fully supports route leaking using route-target import/export or static routes; this statement is false.
Trap 3: The import map is missing in VRF-B.
An import map is optional. If route-target import is configured in VRF-B, it will import all matching routes regardless of an import map.
- A
The router does not have iBGP configured between the VRFs.
Why wrong: iBGP is not required for route leaking between VRFs on the same router; route-target import/export operates without BGP.
- B
The route-target export is not configured in VRF-A.
Correct. Without route-target export on VRF-A, its routes are not advertised, so VRF-B cannot learn them even with proper import configuration.
- C
The router is using VRF-lite, which does not support route leaking.
Why wrong: VRF-lite fully supports route leaking using route-target import/export or static routes; this statement is false.
- D
The import map is missing in VRF-B.
Why wrong: An import map is optional. If route-target import is configured in VRF-B, it will import all matching routes regardless of an import map.