Question 981 of 1,819
AI and Network OperationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

Intent-based networking is the correct choice because it represents a closed-loop system where the network continuously validates its operational state against a defined business intent, using AI/ML to automatically detect anomalies, correlate telemetry, and trigger remediation without manual intervention. In this scenario, the engineer wants the network to autonomously identify the root cause of the latency spike—such as a routing loop or queue drops—and take corrective action like rerouting traffic or adjusting QoS, which is exactly what intent-based networking delivers through platforms like Cisco DNA Center with Assurance. On the CCNA 200-301 v2 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how automation and AI-driven operations differ from traditional reactive troubleshooting; a common trap is confusing IBN with simple scripting or SDN, but remember that IBN focuses on continuous verification of intent, not just programmability. A helpful memory tip: think of IBN as “tell the network what you want, not how to do it”—the network figures out the how.

CCNA AI and Network Operations Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of ai and network operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer at a large enterprise observes repeated spikes in latency on the core network every weekday at 10:00 AM, but no corresponding increase in overall bandwidth utilization. The engineer wants to use AI/ML to automatically identify the root cause and take corrective action without manual intervention. Which concept best describes this approach?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Intent-based networking

Intent-based networking (IBN) is correct because it describes a closed-loop system where the network continuously validates that its operational state matches the desired business intent. In this scenario, the engineer wants the network to automatically detect the latency anomaly, correlate it with other telemetry (e.g., routing changes, queue drops), and take corrective action (e.g., reroute traffic, adjust QoS) without human intervention — which is the core promise of IBN, often implemented via Cisco's DNA Center with Assurance and AI/ML capabilities.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Anomaly detection

    Why it's wrong here

    Anomaly detection identifies unusual patterns (like latency spikes), but it does not include automatic corrective action. The scenario requires both detection and automated response.

  • Intent-based networking

    Why this is correct

    Intent-based networking (IBN) uses closed-loop automation to continuously monitor the network, detect when the actual state deviates from the intended state (e.g., latency spikes), and automatically reconfigure the network to restore the intent. This matches the scenario of automatic identification and correction.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Predictive analytics

    Why it's wrong here

    Predictive analytics forecasts future events (e.g., predicting when a link will fail), but it does not automatically take corrective action. The scenario involves detecting and correcting an existing anomaly, not predicting a future one.

  • Machine learning classification

    Why it's wrong here

    Machine learning classification categorizes data (e.g., classifying traffic as normal or anomalous), but it does not inherently include automated corrective actions. The scenario requires a system that both detects and corrects.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Intent-based networkingCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Intent-based networking (IBN) uses closed-loop automation to continuously monitor the network, detect when the actual state deviates from the intended state (e.g., latency spikes), and automatically reconfigure the network to restore the intent. This matches the scenario of automatic identification and correction.

Anomaly detectionWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Anomaly detection identifies unusual patterns like latency spikes, but it does not include automatic corrective action. The scenario requires both detection and automated response, which anomaly detection alone cannot provide.

Why candidates choose this

Students may think anomaly detection is sufficient because it can identify the latency spikes, but they overlook the requirement for automatic corrective action without manual intervention.

Predictive analyticsWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Predictive analytics forecasts future events (e.g., predicting when a link will fail), but it does not automatically take corrective action. The scenario involves detecting and correcting an existing anomaly, not predicting a future one.

Why candidates choose this

Students might confuse predictive analytics with proactive detection, but the scenario describes an ongoing issue that needs immediate correction, not prediction of future events.

Machine learning classificationWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Machine learning classification categorizes data (e.g., classifying traffic as normal or anomalous), but it does not inherently include automated corrective actions. The scenario requires a system that both detects and corrects.

Why candidates choose this

Students may think classification can identify the root cause, but classification alone does not trigger automated corrective actions; it only labels data.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between a single AI/ML technique (like anomaly detection) and the full closed-loop automation framework (IBN), leading candidates to pick the narrower answer when the question explicitly requires both detection and automated corrective action.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Anomaly detection identifies unusual patterns (like latency spikes), but it does not include automatic corrective action. The scenario requires both detection and automated response.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, Cisco's IBN uses a combination of model-driven telemetry (e.g., YANG data models over NETCONF/gRPC), AI/ML engines in DNA Center Assurance to correlate syslog, NetFlow, and SNMP data, and automated policy enforcement via Cisco SD-Access or Catalyst Center. A subtle behavior is that IBN can dynamically adjust routing policies using Segment Routing or QoS marking based on real-time intent verification, ensuring that even if bandwidth utilization is normal, micro-bursts or bufferbloat causing latency are mitigated automatically.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 200-301 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

AI and Network Operations — This question tests AI and Network Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Intent-based networking — Intent-based networking (IBN) is correct because it describes a closed-loop system where the network continuously validates that its operational state matches the desired business intent. In this scenario, the engineer wants the network to automatically detect the latency anomaly, correlate it with other telemetry (e.g., routing changes, queue drops), and take corrective action (e.g., reroute traffic, adjust QoS) without human intervention — which is the core promise of IBN, often implemented via Cisco's DNA Center with Assurance and AI/ML capabilities.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 200-301 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.