easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

You want to protect an Application Load Balancer (ALB) from common web exploits using AWS WAF. The application is not using CloudFront. Which AWS WAF deployment scope should you choose so the WAF rules apply to the ALB?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

You want to protect an Application Load Balancer (ALB) from common web exploits using AWS WAF. The application is not using CloudFront. Which AWS WAF deployment scope should you choose so the WAF rules apply to the ALB?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Use AWS WAF regional scope (associate the web ACL with the ALB resource)

ALBs are regional resources. When you protect an ALB without CloudFront, you should use the regional WAF scope and associate the web ACL directly with the ALB, so WAF can inspect incoming requests destined for that ALB.

B

Distractor review

Use AWS WAF CloudFront (global) scope and associate the web ACL with the ALB

CloudFront scope is designed for CloudFront distributions. ALB traffic is handled by regional WAF, not the CloudFront (global) scope, so this association path would not provide the intended protection.

C

Distractor review

Use AWS Shield Advanced and rely on it to inspect payloads for SQL injection and XSS

Shield Advanced primarily focuses on DDoS protection. AWS WAF provides rule-based inspection and blocking of application-layer threats such as SQL injection and XSS via managed rules/custom rules.

D

Distractor review

Use security groups only, because they can detect SQL injection patterns in HTTP requests

Security groups control network traffic (protocols/ports/IPs). They do not inspect HTTP payload content, so they cannot detect and block application-layer exploit patterns like SQL injection or XSS.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use AWS WAF regional scope (associate the web ACL with the ALB resource) — For AWS WAF protecting an Application Load Balancer, use the regional WAF scope and associate the web ACL directly with the ALB. AWS WAF has different scopes: CloudFront scope applies to CloudFront distributions, while regional scope applies to ALB/API Gateway and other regional endpoints. Since the application is not behind CloudFront, regional scope is required for WAF rules to be evaluated for ALB requests. Why others are wrong: CloudFront scope is intended for CloudFront distributions, not ALB association. Shield Advanced is not a substitute for WAF because it does not provide application-layer rule inspection. Security groups do not inspect HTTP payloads, so they cannot block SQL injection/XSS.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.