hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Network test results:
- Average node-to-node RTT: 180-240 microseconds
- Jitter spikes during busy periods: up to 4 ms
- Workload type: cluster-style analytics with frequent small messages
- Requirement: lowest possible latency among peers
- Deployment note: all 10 instances are currently in separate subnets within one AZ

Based on the exhibit, a low-latency analytics platform runs 10 EC2 instances in the same Availability Zone. The nodes exchange a very high volume of east-west messages and must experience the lowest possible network latency and jitter. A separate operations team also wants to reduce the risk that all nodes land on the same physical hardware rack. Which placement strategy should the solutions architect use?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, a low-latency analytics platform runs 10 EC2 instances in the same Availability Zone. The nodes exchange a very high volume of east-west messages and must experience the lowest possible network latency and jitter. A separate operations team also wants to reduce the risk that all nodes land on the same physical hardware rack. Which placement strategy should the solutions architect use?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Cluster placement group

Cluster placement groups place instances physically close together to maximize bandwidth and minimize latency. That is the best fit for a high-chatty, east-west workload where network performance matters more than fault isolation at the rack level.

B

Distractor review

Spread placement group

Spread placement groups are meant to reduce correlated hardware failure risk, but they do not optimize for the lowest possible network latency between instances.

C

Distractor review

Partition placement group

Partition placement groups help isolate large distributed systems across hardware partitions, but they are not the best option when the primary goal is the tightest possible inter-node latency.

D

Distractor review

Auto Scaling group with a mixed instances policy

Auto Scaling can control instance count and diversity, but it does not by itself provide the specialized placement needed for ultra-low-latency east-west traffic.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Cluster placement group — The exhibit emphasizes very frequent node-to-node traffic, low jitter, and the lowest possible inter-instance latency. Cluster placement groups are designed for exactly that: keeping instances physically close to each other within an Availability Zone to maximize network performance. Separate subnets do not guarantee favorable placement, so the placement strategy—not just subnet layout—is what matters here. The hardware-rack concern is secondary to the stated performance priority. Spread placement groups are intended for fault isolation, not for minimizing latency. Partition placement groups are useful for large distributed systems that need isolation across partitions, but they are not the highest-performance choice for tightly coupled nodes. An Auto Scaling group manages fleet size and scaling behavior, but it does not provide the specific physical colocation required for this network-heavy analytics workload.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.