easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

An engineering team deploys a stateless web API on EC2 using an Auto Scaling group and an Application Load Balancer (ALB). During a recent test, they noticed that when one Availability Zone was unavailable, traffic failed until new instances were manually launched. Which change most directly improves automatic failover for the compute layer within a single Region?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

An engineering team deploys a stateless web API on EC2 using an Auto Scaling group and an Application Load Balancer (ALB). During a recent test, they noticed that when one Availability Zone was unavailable, traffic failed until new instances were manually launched. Which change most directly improves automatic failover for the compute layer within a single Region?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Place the Auto Scaling group in only one subnet so instance launches are simpler.

Using only one subnet/AZ removes redundancy. An AZ outage would still take down capacity until manual action occurs.

B

Best answer

Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones.

Spreading the ALB and Auto Scaling group across at least two AZs provides redundant capacity. If one AZ fails, the ALB continues routing to healthy targets in the other AZ.

C

Distractor review

Increase the target group deregistration delay to allow old instances to stay longer.

Changing deregistration delay affects connection draining, not capacity placement across AZs. It doesn’t create additional resilient instances.

D

Distractor review

Use a Network Load Balancer, but keep all subnets in a single Availability Zone.

Switching load balancer type doesn’t fix the root cause. If capacity is only in one AZ, failures will still impact the service.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Ensure the ALB and Auto Scaling group span multiple subnets in at least two Availability Zones. — To achieve automatic failover for stateless compute within a Region, the ALB and the Auto Scaling group must provide capacity in more than one Availability Zone. When both are associated with subnets across at least two AZs, the ALB can continue routing requests to healthy targets in surviving AZs. This design reduces manual intervention during AZ impairment and improves overall availability for the compute tier. Why others are wrong: Restricting the Auto Scaling group to one subnet/AZ eliminates redundancy, so an AZ outage still breaks service. Deregistration delay tweaks do not increase resiliency; they only influence how connections are handled during instance lifecycle events. Using a different load balancer while keeping single-AZ placement still leaves the same single point of failure.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.