mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

An Auto Scaling group for a background worker runs EC2 instances continuously. Over the last 30 days, CloudWatch shows sustained CPU utilization around 6% with no memory pressure, and queue processing latency meets all SLAs. The team wants to lower monthly cost with minimal risk. What is the best next action?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

An Auto Scaling group for a background worker runs EC2 instances continuously. Over the last 30 days, CloudWatch shows sustained CPU utilization around 6% with no memory pressure, and queue processing latency meets all SLAs. The team wants to lower monthly cost with minimal risk. What is the best next action?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Increase the instance size to reduce CPU throttling risk

The metrics show sustained low CPU with no reported throttling risk. Increasing size would likely increase cost immediately without addressing an existing performance problem.

B

Best answer

Perform right sizing by downsizing to a smaller instance family/size and validate SLAs

Right sizing uses actual utilization to remove overprovisioning. With low CPU and no memory pressure and SLAs already met, downsizing (while validating under load and during a controlled rollout) is the safest way to reduce waste.

C

Distractor review

Switch the group to Spot Instances to reduce cost without changing instance sizing

Spot could reduce compute price, but it introduces interruption risk and additional operational complexity. When the primary waste is clearly overprovisioned capacity, downsizing is the more direct and lower-risk cost optimization.

D

Distractor review

Buy Reserved Instances with a long term commitment before making any sizing changes

Purchasing capacity commitments can reduce unit price, but it does not fix the cost waste from running much larger-than-needed instances. Since the instance utilization indicates overprovisioning, right sizing should come first to maximize savings with minimal risk.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Perform right sizing by downsizing to a smaller instance family/size and validate SLAs — Right sizing is the best next action. The workload is already meeting latency SLAs and shows sustained low CPU (~6%) with no memory pressure, which indicates overprovisioned capacity. The safest approach is to downsize (or move to a more efficient instance family) and validate performance/latency during a controlled rollout, ensuring SLAs remain satisfied before broader changes. Increasing instance size targets a risk that the metrics do not show and would likely raise cost. Switching to Spot does not address the root cause of wasted capacity and can add interruption handling complexity. Reserved Instances/Savings Plans can lower unit cost, but they do not correct the fact that the instances are running far below needed capacity, so overall savings may be less than downsizing first.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.