mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A company hosts an internal HTTP API on an internal Network Load Balancer (NLB) in VPC A. A partner team in a separate AWS account needs access, but their VPC CIDR overlaps with VPC A, so VPC peering is not feasible.

Security requirements state the API must remain non-public (no internet-facing ALB/NLB) and access must use AWS private networking.

Which architecture best meets these requirements?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A company hosts an internal HTTP API on an internal Network Load Balancer (NLB) in VPC A. A partner team in a separate AWS account needs access, but their VPC CIDR overlaps with VPC A, so VPC peering is not feasible.

Security requirements state the API must remain non-public (no internet-facing ALB/NLB) and access must use AWS private networking.

Which architecture best meets these requirements?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Use AWS PrivateLink by creating a VPC endpoint service backed by the NLB in VPC A, then create an interface VPC endpoint in the partner VPC with appropriate endpoint access controls.

PrivateLink exposes the service privately via interface endpoints, avoiding peering and keeping the NLB non-public for secure partner access.

B

Distractor review

Expose the NLB to the internet with an Elastic IP and restrict access using the NLB’s security group only.

Making the NLB internet-facing violates non-public requirements, even if security groups limit allowed sources.

C

Distractor review

Use VPC peering between VPC A and the partner VPC and update route tables to resolve the overlap.

VPC peering cannot handle overlapping CIDRs, and route-table changes cannot resolve IP address overlap safely.

D

Distractor review

Deploy a NAT gateway in VPC A and route the partner’s traffic to the NLB through the NAT gateway.

NAT gateways enable outbound internet egress for instances, not private, deterministic access to internal load balancers across accounts.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use AWS PrivateLink by creating a VPC endpoint service backed by the NLB in VPC A, then create an interface VPC endpoint in the partner VPC with appropriate endpoint access controls. — PrivateLink is designed for exactly this scenario: you want a partner to consume a service privately without requiring internet access or VPC peering, and CIDR overlap prevents classic peering. By creating a VPC endpoint service backed by your internal NLB in VPC A and then creating an interface VPC endpoint in the partner VPC, traffic stays within AWS networking and reaches the service via the endpoint ENIs. Access can be restricted to approved principals, enabling defense-in-depth while keeping the NLB non-public. Why others are wrong: Option B violates non-public requirements by using an internet-facing load balancer. Option C is incompatible with the stated constraint: peering cannot fix overlapping CIDRs. Option D misunderstands NAT gateway purpose and does not provide a private service-consumption path. Only PrivateLink uses interface endpoints to privately expose NLB-backed services across VPC/account boundaries without peering.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.