Question 623 of 1,755
ModelinghardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Two Effective Actions to Reduce Variance in Random Forest

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of modeling. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data scientist is training a random forest model for regression. The model shows high variance on the validation set. Which TWO actions are most likely to reduce variance? (Choose 2.)

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Decrease the maximum depth of trees

Both decreasing the maximum depth of trees (B) and increasing the minimum samples per leaf (C) reduce the complexity of individual trees. Decreasing max depth limits tree growth, preventing overfitting to noise. Increasing min samples per leaf forces leaves to contain more samples, smoothing predictions and reducing variance. Together, these regularization techniques directly combat high variance in random forest models.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use bootstrap sampling with replacement

    Why it's wrong here

    Bootstrap is inherent to random forest and not a variance reduction technique.

  • Decrease the maximum depth of trees

    Why this is correct

    Shallow trees reduce overfitting, lowering variance.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the minimum samples per leaf

    Why this is correct

    Larger leaf samples reduce model complexity, reducing variance.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the number of trees in the forest

    Why it's wrong here

    More trees typically stabilize predictions, reducing variance.

  • Increase the number of features considered at each split

    Why it's wrong here

    More features can increase variance.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The MLS-C01 exam often tests the misconception that adding more trees always reduces variance, but the trap here is that while more trees reduce variance from averaging, they do not address the root cause of overfitting from overly complex individual trees.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In random forests, variance is primarily controlled by limiting tree complexity (e.g., max_depth, min_samples_leaf) and by increasing tree diversity through feature subsampling. Decreasing max_depth or increasing min_samples_leaf forces trees to be simpler, reducing their ability to memorize noise. A real-world scenario: on a dataset with many irrelevant features, deep trees can split on noise, causing high variance; capping depth or requiring more samples per leaf forces splits to be based on more generalizable patterns.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Modeling — This question tests Modeling — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Decrease the maximum depth of trees — Both decreasing the maximum depth of trees (B) and increasing the minimum samples per leaf (C) reduce the complexity of individual trees. Decreasing max depth limits tree growth, preventing overfitting to noise. Increasing min samples per leaf forces leaves to contain more samples, smoothing predictions and reducing variance. Together, these regularization techniques directly combat high variance in random forest models.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More MLS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.