A company is running an Amazon RDS for MySQL Multi-AZ DB instance. The application experiences a brief write disruption during automatic failover. The database workload has low write latency requirements. Which configuration change would minimize application impact during failover?
Multi-AZ DB cluster provides faster failover than standard Multi-AZ.
Why this answer
Using a read replica for failover is not supported in RDS MySQL; Multi-AZ is the correct approach. Option D (Multi-AZ cluster) provides faster failover than Multi-AZ with a standby. Option A is correct because RDS Multi-AZ cluster uses a writer and two reader instances, reducing failover time.
Option B is not supported. Option C increases cost without performance benefit.