These questions describe a network symptom and ask you to identify the root cause or the correct fix. They appear across all certification exams and reward systematic thinking over memorisation. The best candidates follow a consistent troubleshooting framework even under time pressure.
Start Scenario PracticeA network engineer is troubleshooting OSPFv3 adjacency between two directly connected Cisco routers, R1 and R2, both running IOS-XE. The engineer configures OSPFv3 on both routers but notices that the adjacency does not form. The engineer runs 'show ospfv3 neighbor' on R1 and sees no neighbors. What is the most likely cause of this issue?
Explanation: Option B is correct because OSPFv3 requires explicit interface-level configuration to enable the protocol on a specific interface. The correct command is 'ospfv3 1 ipv6 area 0' (or 'ipv6 ospf 1 area 0' for the traditional OSPFv3 configuration). Without this command, the interface does not participate in OSPFv3, so no Hello packets are sent or received, preventing adjacency formation.
A network administrator receives a call from a user who cannot access any external websites from their wired workstation. The user can ping the default gateway successfully, but fails to ping 8.8.8.8. The administrator runs ipconfig /all on the workstation and sees an IP address of 192.168.1.50, subnet mask 255.255.255.0, and default gateway 192.168.1.1. What is the most likely cause of this issue?
Explanation: The user can successfully ping 192.168.1.1, proving local IP connectivity to that device. However, the device at 192.168.1.1 may not be the correct default gateway for reaching external networks; the actual gateway router might be at a different IP (e.g., 192.168.1.254). This misconfiguration explains why pings to 8.8.8.8 fail even though the local gateway responds, as the workstation sends external traffic to the wrong next-hop address.
A network administrator is troubleshooting a connectivity issue between two remote sites connected via a WAN link. Hosts on VLAN 10 at Site A (192.168.10.0/24) cannot ping the server at Site B (10.10.20.100). The router at Site A has a default route configured with the next-hop IP address 10.10.10.2. The administrator checks the routing table on Router A and notices that the default route is not installed. What is the most likely cause of the problem?
Explanation: Option D is correct because the default route uses a next-hop IP (10.10.10.2) and will only be installed in the routing table if that next-hop is reachable. Since the router’s routing table shows no default route, the most likely cause is that the next-hop 10.10.10.2 is unreachable, preventing the static route from being used. This explains why traffic fails despite the configuration.
A junior network engineer configured a floating static route on Router R1 to provide backup connectivity to a remote network 10.10.10.0/24. The primary connection uses OSPF. However, after the primary link fails, hosts on R1 cannot reach the remote network. The OSPF adjacency is down, and the floating static route is not appearing in the routing table. Based on the exhibit, what is the most likely cause of the issue?
Explanation: Option B is correct because the floating static route's next-hop becomes unreachable after the primary OSPF link fails. In the exhibit, the next-hop IP is likely configured to an address that is only reachable via OSPF; when that adjacency drops, the router has no route to the next-hop, so it cannot recursively resolve the static route. As a result, the route does not appear in the routing table. Option A is wrong because the route is present in the configuration (as a floating static route). Option C is wrong because the administrative distance of the floating static route is intentionally higher than OSPF's so that it only installs when OSPF fails; this is correct behavior. Option D is wrong because a default route would not override a more specific static route to 10.10.10.0/24.
A client can join a secure employee SSID, but traffic is consistently placed into a guest-style restricted path. Which area should be investigated first?
Explanation: The strongest first area to investigate is the mapping between the authenticated user or WLAN and the policy or VLAN that is applied afterward. In practical terms, the client is joining successfully, so the issue is not basic RF visibility or initial authentication. The clue is that the wrong access policy is being applied after the join process. This is a highly realistic wireless policy troubleshooting scenario because the failure happens after successful connectivity setup.
+10 more scenario questions available
Practice all Troubleshooting Scenario QuestionsThese questions describe a network symptom and ask you to identify the root cause or the correct fix. They appear across all certification exams and reward systematic thinking over memorisation. The best candidates follow a consistent troubleshooting framework even under time pressure. These appear throughout the 200-301 and require you to apply your knowledge, not just recall facts.
Cisco doesn't publish an exact breakdown, but scenario-based questions (especially exhibit and command-output formats) make up a significant portion of the 200-301. Practicing each scenario type ensures you're ready for any format.
Yes. Courseiva provides free 200-301 scenario practice across all official exam domains. The platform includes scenario-based questions, command-output interpretation, topic-based practice, mock exams, and readiness tracking — no account required.
Launch a full Troubleshooting Scenario Questions session with instant scoring and detailed explanations.
Start Scenario Practice →