MLS-C01 Timed Practice Test 2 — 10 Questions

Question 1

A company runs a real-time fraud detection system using Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with 100 shards. Data is consumed by a custom Java application running on Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group. The application processes records and writes results to a DynamoDB table. Over the past month, the application has experienced intermittent slowdowns and the DynamoDB write capacity has been fully utilized during peak hours. The team wants to improve throughput without losing the ability to reprocess failed records. The application currently uses the Kinesis Client Library (KCL) with DynamoDB as the lease table. The team is considering the following changes: A. Increase the number of EC2 instances to match the number of shards. B. Switch to using AWS Lambda as the consumer to handle scaling automatically. C. Increase the write capacity of the DynamoDB lease table to handle more workers. D. Use enhanced fan-out to have each consumer receive its own 2 MB/second shard throughput. Which change should the team implement first to address the issue?

Accepted Answer

Use enhanced fan-out to have each consumer receive its own 2 MB/second shard throughput.. The primary bottleneck is DynamoDB write capacity being fully utilized during peak hours. Enhanced fan-out (option B) provides each consumer with a dedicated 2 MB/second read throughput per shard, eliminating the need for consumers to contend for the shared 2 MB/second per shard. This reduces the load on the DynamoDB lease table because workers no longer need to poll for records, which in turn lowers the write operations to the lease table and alleviates the DynamoDB write capacity issue.

Answer

Increase the write capacity of the DynamoDB lease table to handle more workers.

Answer

Switch to using AWS Lambda as the consumer to handle scaling automatically.

Answer

Increase the number of EC2 instances to match the number of shards.

Question 2

A data scientist is performing EDA on a dataset with 1,000 features and 10,000 rows. The target variable is binary. After checking for multicollinearity, the scientist finds many pairs of features with correlation > 0.95. Which action should be taken to prepare the data for modeling?

Accepted Answer

For each highly correlated pair, remove one feature based on domain knowledge or higher correlation with target.. Option C is correct because when features are highly correlated (e.g., > 0.95), they introduce multicollinearity, which can destabilize coefficient estimates in linear models and reduce interpretability. Removing one feature from each correlated pair based on domain knowledge or its correlation with the target variable preserves predictive power while reducing redundancy. This approach is more targeted than PCA, which transforms features into uncorrelated components but sacrifices interpretability and may not align with the binary target.

Answer

Apply PCA to all features to decorrelate them.

Answer

Standardize all features using StandardScaler.

Answer

Randomly drop half of the correlated features.

Question 3

Match each hyperparameter tuning strategy to its description.

Question 4

Match each AWS AI service to its capability.

Question 5

A data scientist is analyzing a dataset with missing values in 30% of the rows for the 'age' column. The data scientist decides to impute the missing values with the median of the observed 'age' values. What is a potential drawback of this approach?

Accepted Answer

The imputed values may reduce the variance of the 'age' distribution.. Imputing missing values with the median of the observed data artificially concentrates imputed values around the center of the distribution. This reduces the overall variance of the 'age' column because the imputed values do not reflect the natural spread of the data, potentially distorting downstream analyses like regression or clustering that rely on variance structure.

Answer

The imputation will introduce bias if the missing values are not random.

Answer

Imputation using median is computationally expensive for large datasets.

Answer

The imputed values will increase the variance of the feature, leading to overfitting.

Question 6

An e-commerce company uses a linear regression model to predict customer lifetime value (LTV). The model shows high variance on the test set, with training RMSE much lower than test RMSE. Which of the following is the MOST effective approach to reduce overfitting?

Accepted Answer

Apply L2 regularization (Ridge regression). High variance (low training RMSE, high test RMSE) indicates overfitting. L2 regularization (Ridge regression) adds a penalty proportional to the square of the coefficients, shrinking them toward zero without eliminating them, which reduces model complexity and improves generalization. This directly addresses overfitting by constraining the model's sensitivity to noise in the training data.

Answer

Use a polynomial kernel in a support vector regressor

Answer

Add more features, including interaction terms

Answer

Increase training data size by duplicating existing samples

Question 7

A data scientist is training a deep learning model using Amazon SageMaker. The training loss is decreasing, but the validation loss starts increasing after 10 epochs. The model is overfitting. Which TWO actions should the data scientist take to reduce overfitting? (Choose 2.)

Accepted Answer

Add dropout layers. Option D is correct because dropout layers randomly deactivate a fraction of neurons during training, which forces the network to learn more robust features and reduces co-adaptation, a common cause of overfitting. This technique is particularly effective in deep learning models trained on SageMaker, where large architectures can quickly memorize training data.

Answer

Increase the number of layers

Answer

Remove L2 regularization

Answer

Increase the number of training steps

Question 8

A data scientist is exploring a dataset with 500 features and 10,000 samples. The data scientist computes the pairwise correlation matrix and finds that many features have correlations above 0.9. The data scientist wants to reduce the dataset to 50 features while preserving as much variance as possible. Which technique should be used?

Accepted Answer

Apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and keep the top 50 principal components.. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is the correct technique because it performs an orthogonal linear transformation that projects the original 500 features into a new coordinate system where the axes (principal components) are ordered by the variance they capture. By keeping the top 50 principal components, the data scientist retains the maximum possible variance in the reduced 50-dimensional space, directly addressing the goal of preserving variance while handling high multicollinearity.

Answer

Remove all but one feature from each group of highly correlated features.

Answer

Use Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to project to 50 dimensions.

Answer

Use t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) to reduce to 50 dimensions.

Question 9

A data scientist is analyzing a dataset of customer reviews. The dataset contains a text column 'review' and a numerical rating from 1 to 5. The data scientist wants to create features for sentiment analysis. Which THREE preprocessing steps should be applied to the text data before feature extraction? (Choose THREE.)

Accepted Answer

Apply stemming to reduce words to their root form.. Option B is correct because stemming reduces words to their root form (e.g., 'running' to 'run'), which consolidates variations of the same word and reduces feature dimensionality. This is a standard preprocessing step before feature extraction in NLP tasks like sentiment analysis, as it helps the model generalize across different word forms.

Answer

Standardize the text data using z-score normalization.

Answer

Tokenize the text into individual words.

Question 10

During EDA, a data scientist notices that a feature has a high proportion of missing values (e.g., 70%). The feature is continuous and expected to be important based on domain knowledge. What is the best approach to handle this?

Accepted Answer

Create a binary indicator for missingness and impute the continuous values with the median.. Option B is correct because it preserves the predictive signal from the feature while accounting for the pattern of missingness. Creating a binary indicator allows the model to learn whether missingness itself is informative, and median imputation is robust to outliers for a continuous feature. This approach avoids the bias of dropping the feature entirely and is more principled than arbitrary out-of-range imputation.

Answer

Remove the feature entirely to avoid bias.

Answer

Impute missing values with -1 since it is out of range.

Answer

Drop all rows with missing values in that feature.