An administrator is planning the storage architecture for a vSphere Foundation 9.0 cluster utilizing external NFS version 4.1 datastores. What is a key architectural advantage of NFS 4.1 compared to NFSv3 in vSphere?
NFS 4.1 introduces session trunking and native client-side multipathing, allowing multiple TCP connections across paths for load balancing and failover. NFSv3 lacks this, relying on a single path, so this satisfies the stem's requirement for a key architectural advantage in vSphere.
Why this answer
NFS 4.1 adds native multipathing support (SESSION trunking/multipathing) directly within the ESXi client, whereas NFSv3 relied on multiple mount points or third-party workarounds for multipathing.