Courseiva

CSM Service to the Organization Practice Question

Exhibit

{
  "initiative": "Enterprise Agile Transformation",
  "metrics_tracked": [
    "Individual Developer Velocity",
    "Lines of Code Written",
    "Percentage of Sprint Goal Met"
  ],
  "management_action": "Ranking teams from highest to lowest velocity monthly"
}

Refer to the exhibit. Senior management is evaluating Scrum Team performance using the metrics shown in the exhibit and publishing a monthly stack ranking of teams based on velocity. As a ScrumMaster, how should you address this practice to best serve the organization?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common pitfall is assuming the ScrumMaster should help management calculate velocity more accurately, validating the harmful practice of comparing teams instead of stopping it.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Coach management on the destructive impact of using internal planning metrics for performance evaluation, guiding them toward measuring customer value and outcomes.

Velocity is a capacity measure intended solely for internal team planning, not a performance metric for comparison across teams. Publishing stack rankings based on velocity incentivizes gaming the system, inflates story points, and destroys psychological safety and collaboration. The ScrumMaster must coach leadership away from using internal metrics for evaluation, guiding them instead toward tracking value delivery, customer satisfaction, and business outcomes that reflect true organizational health.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Help management refine the formula used to calculate velocity so that team comparisons become mathematically fair and statistically accurate.

    Why it's wrong here

    Velocity is a forecasting aid for one team, not a productivity metric; ranking teams on it drives point inflation and hides real impediments. Refining the formula cannot make cross-team comparison valid, since estimation baselines differ. The ScrumMaster should instead coach management to drop the ranking and use velocity only for the team's own sprint planning.

  • ✓

    Coach management on the destructive impact of using internal planning metrics for performance evaluation, guiding them toward measuring customer value and outcomes.

    Why this is correct

    Velocity is a planning metric for forecasting, not a performance measure; stack ranking teams on it distorts behaviour and undermines empiricism. Coaching management toward customer-value and outcome metrics addresses the misuse while preserving Scrum's self-managing team principle.

  • ✗

    Instruct all development teams to artificially inflate their story point estimates so that every single team ties for the top ranking every month.

    Why it's wrong here

    Instructing teams to inflate estimates corrupts the data and breaches Scrum values of openness and honesty, leaving the underlying misuse of velocity unaddressed. Inflating estimates is defensible only where teams genuinely re-estimate after learning, never as a coordinated tactic against management.

  • ✗

    Publicly publish the salaries and individual performance reviews of the management team to create parity and force them to abandon their stack-ranking practice.

    Why it's wrong here

    Publishing management salaries and reviews retaliates against leadership rather than addressing the metric misuse, damaging trust and your own credibility. Transparency of this kind belongs in governance or pay-equity initiatives, not in response to velocity being used as a performance ranking.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CSM question from scratch — 312 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scrum Alliance exam blueprint

This CSM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scrum Alliance certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CSM exam.