SSM Introducing Scrum in SAFe Practice Question
What is the primary purpose of the Iteration Review in a SAFe Scrum environment?
⚠ Common exam trap
Candidates frequently mistake this for a 'manager approval' session or a status meeting, forgetting that the primary goal is stakeholder feedback on the actual working product increment.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
To demonstrate the working solution and gather feedback from key stakeholders.
The Iteration Review serves to demonstrate the increment of value produced during the iteration to stakeholders. It provides a feedback loop that validates the team's progress against the PI objectives. By gathering stakeholder input, the team can adjust their backlog and improve their future work, ensuring the solution remains aligned with customer needs and the overall vision.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
To provide a performance evaluation for each team member.
Why it's wrong here
The Iteration Review is focused on the product, not the individuals. Performance evaluations are separate organizational processes. Evaluating individuals during a product review creates fear, discourages transparency, and distracts from the collaborative goal of improving the product and satisfying stakeholder needs through honest feedback on the delivered work.
- ✓
To demonstrate the working solution and gather feedback from key stakeholders.
Why this is correct
The review is the primary mechanism for demonstrating the increment. It allows stakeholders to interact with the working software and provide immediate feedback. This ensures that the team is building the right thing and allows for course correction early in the development cycle, which is essential for success.
- ✗
To finalize the design documents for the next release.
Why it's wrong here
Iteration reviews focus on working software, not document creation. While documentation may be necessary, it is not the primary purpose of the review. Focusing on documents rather than working solutions prevents the team from validating their progress with stakeholders, which is the core intent of Agile development practices.
- ✗
To decide which team members will be laid off.
Why it's wrong here
This is completely contrary to the values of Agile and SAFe. The review is a constructive, collaborative session meant to drive value. Using the review to make personnel decisions would destroy psychological safety, stop the free flow of information, and ruin the team's ability to innovate and deliver.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every SSM question from scratch — 385 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint
This SSM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSM exam.