Courseiva
Introducing Scrum in SAFe →mediumMultiple Select

SSM Introducing Scrum in SAFe Practice Question

An organization is introducing Scrum inside a SAFe Agile Release Train, and a new Scrum Master is clarifying how the Scrum Master serves the Scrum Team and the larger organization. Which two services are explicitly part of the Scrum Master's role in this context? (Choose two.)

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is lumping backlog ownership or technical direction into the Scrum Master role because the Scrum Master is visibly active in team events, when those accountabilities belong elsewhere.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Helping the team and organization adopt Scrum by removing impediments to the team's progress.

SAFe describes the Scrum Master as serving the team by coaching self-management and cross-functionality, and serving the organization by helping it adopt Scrum and removing impediments. Those two services build capability and clear the path for delivery. Backlog ownership, technical direction, and quality approval belong to the Product Owner, the Developers, and the team's Definition of Done respectively, not to the Scrum Master.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Helping the team and organization adopt Scrum by removing impediments to the team's progress.

    Why this is correct

    Removing impediments and helping the broader organization adopt Scrum is another explicit Scrum Master service. When Scrum is new inside an ART, blockers often sit outside the team, so the Scrum Master works with the organization to clear them. This service connects team-level Scrum to enterprise adoption and is not the same as managing the backlog or assigning work.

  • ✗

    Directing the Developers on technical design and architecture decisions during the Iteration.

    Why it's wrong here

    Directing technical design and architecture is not a Scrum Master service and undermines team self-management. Developers own how they build the solution, and architects provide guidance at the ART level. A Scrum Master who dictates technical decisions removes ownership from the people closest to the work and conflicts with the coaching role SAFe expects.

  • ✗

    Approving whether completed stories meet the Definition of Done before they are accepted.

    Why it's wrong here

    Approving completed work against the Definition of Done is not a Scrum Master service. The team applies the Definition of Done, and the Product Owner accepts stories based on acceptance criteria. Turning the Scrum Master into an approver creates a gate that slows flow and contradicts the team's ownership of quality and the Product Owner's ownership of value.

  • ✗

    Owning and prioritizing the Team Backlog to maximize the value delivered each Iteration.

    Why it's wrong here

    Owning and prioritizing the Team Backlog is a Product Owner accountability, not a Scrum Master service. When a Scrum Master takes this on, the separation of accountabilities collapses, and the team loses a clear product direction owner. Backlog ordering requires product and customer insight that belongs with the Product Owner, so this is definitively not part of the Scrum Master role.

  • ✓

    Coaching the team in self-management and cross-functionality so it can deliver value each Iteration.

    Why this is correct

    Coaching the team toward self-management and cross-functionality is a core Scrum Master service in SAFe. It builds the team's ability to own its process and deliver value every Iteration, which is essential when Scrum is being introduced. This service directly supports the team's growth and the ART's flow, and it is distinct from owning backlog content or directing technical work.

About these practice questions

This SSM question is part of Courseiva's 385-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint

This SSM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSM exam.