Question 54 of 528
Transform data with filters and pluginseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Extract Domain from Email Using Ansible regex_replace Filter

This EX294 practice question tests your understanding of transform data with filters and plugins. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An Ansible playbook needs to extract the domain name from a list of email addresses stored in variable `emails`. The domain appears after the '@' symbol. Which filter should be used?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

regex_replace

The `regex_replace` filter can extract the domain by matching the pattern `.*@(.*)` and replacing with `\1`, isolating the part after '@'. This is the correct approach because Ansible's Jinja2 filters include `regex_replace` for pattern-based string extraction, while `split` would require additional steps to isolate the domain.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • split

    Why it's wrong here

    split is a valid Jinja2 filter in Ansible, but it returns a list. To extract the domain, you would need to use `emails | split('@') | map('last')` or index the result, which is less direct than regex_replace.

  • regex_replace

    Why this is correct

    The `regex_replace` filter applies a regular expression to a string and replaces matches with a replacement string. To extract the domain, you can use the pattern `.*@(.*)` and replace with `\1`, effectively capturing the domain. This is the most straightforward method.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • urldecode

    Why it's wrong here

    The `urldecode` filter decodes URL-encoded strings. It is not suitable for extracting domain names from email addresses.

  • base64

    Why it's wrong here

    The `base64` filter encodes or decodes base64 strings. It is not relevant to extracting domain names from email addresses.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Red Hat often tests the misconception that `split` alone can extract a substring, but candidates forget that `split` returns a list and requires indexing, while `regex_replace` directly yields the matched group.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The `regex_replace` filter uses Python's `re.sub` under the hood, allowing capture groups and backreferences. For a list of emails, you would apply it with `map` or a loop: `{{ emails | map('regex_replace', '.*@(.*)', '\1') | list }}`. This is efficient for batch extraction, but note that the pattern must be greedy to handle multiple '@' symbols (e.g., `user@sub@domain.com` would extract `sub@domain.com`).

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the EX294 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related EX294 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free EX294 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this EX294 question test?

Transform data with filters and plugins — This question tests Transform data with filters and plugins — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: regex_replace — The `regex_replace` filter can extract the domain by matching the pattern `.*@(.*)` and replacing with `\1`, isolating the part after '@'. This is the correct approach because Ansible's Jinja2 filters include `regex_replace` for pattern-based string extraction, while `split` would require additional steps to isolate the domain.

What should I do if I get this EX294 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More EX294 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This EX294 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Red Hat certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the EX294 exam.