Courseiva
ITIL Management PracticesmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

ITIL4F ITIL Management Practices Practice Question

Which of the following is a difference between a standard change and a normal change?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Standard changes are pre-approved and follow a predefined procedure

Standard changes are pre-approved and have a defined procedure; normal changes require assessment and approval by a change authority.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Normal changes require approval from the CAB, while standard changes do not require any approval

    Why it's wrong here

    This statement is incorrect because standard changes, while routine and low-risk, still require pre-authorization and follow a defined procedure that includes pre-approved steps. They are not implemented without any approval whatsoever; rather, the approval is granted in advance for the specific type of change. Furthermore, normal changes do not always require approval from the Change Authority Board (CAB); their approval process is determined by their assessed risk and impact, which might involve different levels of authority or even automated approval for lower-risk normal changes.

  • Standard changes can be implemented without a change request

    Why it's wrong here

    This statement is incorrect. All changes, including standard changes, should be initiated and managed through a change request (CR) to ensure proper recording, tracking, and auditability within the change management practice. While the process for standard changes is highly streamlined, often involving pre-filled templates and automated workflows, the underlying change request mechanism remains essential for governance and control, documenting the pre-authorized activity.

  • Standard changes are always low risk, while normal changes are high risk

    Why it's wrong here

    This statement is inaccurate as it oversimplifies the risk profiles. While standard changes are indeed typically low-risk and well-understood, this is a characteristic that enables their pre-authorization, not the sole defining factor. Conversely, normal changes encompass a broad spectrum of risk and impact, ranging from relatively low to very high, and are categorized by their need for assessment and authorization based on their specific nature, not an inherent 'high risk' label.

  • Standard changes are pre-approved and follow a predefined procedure

    Why this is correct

    This statement accurately describes standard changes in ITIL 4. Standard changes are routine, low-risk, and have a well-understood implementation process, allowing them to be pre-authorized by the change authority. This pre-approval means they do not require additional authorization each time they are implemented, as long as they strictly follow their established, predefined procedure, which ensures efficiency and consistent execution.

About these practice questions

One of 531 original ITIL4F practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This ITIL4F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ITIL4F exam.