An administrator is planning an automated deployment of Cortex XDR agents using an enterprise software distribution tool. Which TWO advantages does using an MSI package offer over an EXE package in this scenario? (Choose two)
Trap 1: Built-in capability to execute shell scripts on Linux servers
MSI packages are strictly for Windows environments and do not execute Linux shell scripts.
Trap 2: Automatic conversion of EXE payloads into macOS PKG files
MSI packages cannot be converted into macOS PKG files.
Trap 3: Exemption from all Windows User Account Control (UAC) prompts…
MSI installations still require administrative privileges and can trigger UAC prompts.
- A
Standardized installation parameters and property passing (e.g., /qn, /norestart)
MSI packages adhere to Windows Installer standards, providing consistent switches and property arguments.
- B
Built-in capability to execute shell scripts on Linux servers
Why wrong: MSI packages are strictly for Windows environments and do not execute Linux shell scripts.
- C
Automatic conversion of EXE payloads into macOS PKG files
Why wrong: MSI packages cannot be converted into macOS PKG files.
- D
Native support for application transforms (.MST files) for customization
MSI packages support MST files to customize installation properties without modifying the original installer.
- E
Exemption from all Windows User Account Control (UAC) prompts without admin rights
Why wrong: MSI installations still require administrative privileges and can trigger UAC prompts.