A Cortex XDR analyst is building an ITDR detection strategy for a hybrid environment where attackers frequently abuse valid credentials. Which TWO identity risk signals should the analyst prioritize to detect credential misuse rather than credential theft? (Choose two.)
Impossible travel indicates that valid credentials are being used from locations that cannot be reached in the elapsed time, which strongly suggests credential misuse rather than theft of a hash or ticket. It relies on successful authentication patterns and location data, so it detects abuse of working credentials. This makes it a high-priority signal for identifying an attacker who already has valid access.
Why this answer
Detecting credential misuse requires signals that reveal valid credentials being used in anomalous ways. Impossible travel and anomalous token issuance both depend on successful authentication patterns and contextual deviations, which indicate an attacker is actively using working credentials. LSASS access, Kerberoasting, and DCSync replication are theft techniques that occur before credentials are usable, so they address a different phase of the attack lifecycle.
Exam trap
The trap here is selecting well-known credential theft techniques when the scenario specifically asks for signals of credential misuse using already-valid credentials.