Question 383 of 1,639
Respond to security incidentshardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The three critical actions to contain a ransomware incident in Microsoft Sentinel are isolating the server from the network using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, reviewing the incident timeline to understand the attack chain, and running a live response to collect forensic artifacts. Isolating the server immediately cuts off lateral movement, which is the primary goal of containment in a ransomware scenario, while the timeline provides the sequence of events needed to trace the initial compromise, and live response gathers volatile data for deeper investigation. On the SC-200 exam, this question tests your ability to prioritize containment over remediation or detection—common traps include choosing to reset a compromised account password, which fails if the attacker has local persistence, or creating a new analytics rule, which is a detection action, not a containment step. To remember the correct trio, think of the mnemonic “I-T-L”: Isolate, Timeline, Live response—these are the immediate, hands-on actions that stop the spread and preserve evidence before any recovery steps begin.

SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your organization uses Microsoft Sentinel and has configured analytics rules for detecting ransomware. You receive an alert indicating possible ransomware activity on a server. Which THREE actions should you take to contain and investigate the incident? (Choose three.)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Initiate a live response session to collect forensic artifacts.

Option A, B, and D are correct. Isolating the server prevents further spread. Reviewing the timeline helps understand the attack. Running a live response to collect artifacts aids investigation. Option C is wrong because resetting the password of a compromised account may not be effective if the attacker has local access. Option E is wrong because creating a new rule is for detection, not containment.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Create a new analytics rule to detect similar behavior.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is a detection improvement, not an immediate containment or investigation step.

  • Initiate a live response session to collect forensic artifacts.

    Why this is correct

    Live response allows collection of evidence for deeper analysis.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Review the incident timeline in Microsoft 365 Defender.

    Why this is correct

    The timeline provides a chronological view of events.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Reset the password of the account that showed anomalous behavior.

    Why it's wrong here

    Not the immediate containment step; focus on isolating the server.

  • Isolate the server from the network using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

    Why this is correct

    Isolation contains the breach and prevents lateral movement.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Initiate a live response session to collect forensic artifacts. — Option A, B, and D are correct. Isolating the server prevents further spread. Reviewing the timeline helps understand the attack. Running a live response to collect artifacts aids investigation. Option C is wrong because resetting the password of a compromised account may not be effective if the attacker has local access. Option E is wrong because creating a new rule is for detection, not containment.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on SC-200

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. During a security incident, a Microsoft Sentinel analytics rule generated an alert for a suspicious sign-in from an unusual location. The incident involves a user whose account has been compromised. The security team needs to take immediate actions to remediate and prevent further damage. Which THREE actions should the security team prioritize?

hard
  • A.Reset the user's password
  • B.Revoke the user's session tokens
  • C.Review audit logs for all users
  • D.Raise the user's risk level in Identity Protection
  • E.Disable the user account in Microsoft Entra ID

Why A: Option A is correct because disabling the user account stops further access. Option C is correct because resetting the password ensures the attacker cannot reuse stolen credentials. Option E is correct because revoking session tokens ends active sessions. Option B is wrong because reviewing audit logs is important but not immediate. Option D is wrong because raising the risk level is a classification, not a remediation.

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.