The answer is using the built-in hunting queries in the Microsoft Sentinel Hunting blade and creating custom KQL queries. These are the two valid methods because threat hunting in Sentinel relies on proactively searching for suspicious activity through query-based investigation, not automated response or static visualization. The Hunting blade offers a curated library of pre-built KQL queries designed by Microsoft security researchers, while custom KQL allows analysts to write and save their own targeted searches against the workspace data. On the SC-200 exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish hunting tools from other security operations features; a common trap is confusing Playbooks (automated response) or Workbooks (visualization dashboards) with interactive hunting. Remember the memory tip: hunt with queries, not with buttons—if it doesn’t let you write or run KQL, it isn’t a hunting method.
SC-200 Perform threat hunting Practice Question
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of perform threat hunting. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Which TWO of the following are valid methods to perform threat hunting in Microsoft Sentinel? (Choose TWO.)
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Create and save custom KQL queries in the Hunting blade
Options A and D are correct. A: The Hunting blade provides a list of built-in hunting queries. D: Custom KQL queries can be created and saved. Option B is wrong because Playbooks are for automated response, not hunting. Option C is wrong because Workbooks are for visualization, not interactive hunting.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✓
Create and save custom KQL queries in the Hunting blade
Why this is correct
Custom queries can be created and saved for reuse.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✓
Use the built-in hunting queries in the Microsoft Sentinel Hunting blade
Why this is correct
The Hunting blade provides pre-built queries to start hunting.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
Configure automated response rules to detect threats
Why it's wrong here
Automated response rules are for incident response, not hunting.
✗
Use Workbooks to visualize data and identify anomalies
Why it's wrong here
Workbooks are for dashboards and visualization, not for querying data interactively.
✗
Create a Playbook to automatically run queries on a schedule
Why it's wrong here
Playbooks are for automated response, not hunting.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
→Underline the problem statement mentally.
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
Related glossary terms
Concepts from this question explained
These glossary pages explain the core terms tested in this SC-200 question in full detail.
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Perform threat hunting — This question tests Perform threat hunting — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Create and save custom KQL queries in the Hunting blade — Options A and D are correct. A: The Hunting blade provides a list of built-in hunting queries. D: Custom KQL queries can be created and saved. Option B is wrong because Playbooks are for automated response, not hunting. Option C is wrong because Workbooks are for visualization, not interactive hunting.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Which TWO of the following are valid methods to initiate a threat hunting session in Microsoft Sentinel?
medium
A.Create a custom analytics rule
B.Import a watchlist as a hunting query
✓ C.Start from a specific detection rule
✓ D.Use a predefined hunting query from the Microsoft Sentinel content hub
E.Enable live mode on a hunting query
Why C: Starting from a specific detection rule and using a predefined hunting query are both valid methods. Live mode is not a feature; custom analytics rules are for detection, not hunting; and watchlists are used for enrichment, not for initiating hunting.
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.