Question 349 of 1,639
Respond to security incidentshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the automation rule is missing the 'triggers' property. In Microsoft Sentinel, an automation rule must include a 'triggers' structure—specifically either 'incidentTrigger' or 'alertTrigger'—to define what event activates the rule; without it, the rule remains inert. The ARM template in the exhibit incorrectly uses a 'sources' property, which is not recognized by Sentinel's automation engine, so the rule never fires when a high-severity incident is created. On the SC-200 exam, this tests your ability to read ARM template syntax and distinguish between valid and invalid rule properties, a common trap where candidates confuse 'sources' with 'triggers'. The key memory tip is: triggers fire the rule, sources do not exist—always look for the word 'triggers' in the template.

SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.
```json
{
  "type": "Microsoft.Security/automations",
  "apiVersion": "2021-01-01-preview",
  "properties": {
    "actions": [
      {
        "type": "LogicApp",
        "order": 1,
        "logicAppResourceId": "/subscriptions/.../providers/Microsoft.Logic/workflows/MyPlaybook"
      }
    ],
    "sources": [
      {
        "sourceType": "Incidents",
        "ruleSets": [
          {
            "rules": [
              {
                "property": "Severity",
                "operator": "Equals",
                "expectedValue": "High"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

Refer to the exhibit. An Azure administrator deploys this ARM template to create a Microsoft Sentinel automation rule. After deployment, the automation rule does not trigger when a high-severity incident is created. What is the most likely reason?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.
```json
{
  "type": "Microsoft.Security/automations",
  "apiVersion": "2021-01-01-preview",
  "properties": {
    "actions": [
      {
        "type": "LogicApp",
        "order": 1,
        "logicAppResourceId": "/subscriptions/.../providers/Microsoft.Logic/workflows/MyPlaybook"
      }
    ],
    "sources": [
      {
        "sourceType": "Incidents",
        "ruleSets": [
          {
            "rules": [
              {
                "property": "Severity",
                "operator": "Equals",
                "expectedValue": "High"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The automation rule is missing the 'triggers' property

Option B is correct because the ARM template snippet does not include a 'triggers' property; Microsoft Sentinel automation rules require the 'triggers' structure (incidentTrigger or alertTrigger) instead of 'sources'. Option A is wrong because 'LogicApp' is a valid action type. Option C is wrong because API version is not the issue. Option D is wrong because the resource type is correct.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The apiVersion is outdated

    Why it's wrong here

    The apiVersion is valid for preview.

  • The action type 'LogicApp' is misspelled

    Why it's wrong here

    'LogicApp' is correct; it should be 'LogicApp'.

  • The automation rule is missing the 'triggers' property

    Why this is correct

    Automation rules require a 'triggers' array specifying the event (e.g., incident creation).

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The resource type should be 'Microsoft.OperationalInsights/workspaces/providers/automations'

    Why it's wrong here

    The resource type is correct as 'Microsoft.Security/automations'.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The automation rule is missing the 'triggers' property — Option B is correct because the ARM template snippet does not include a 'triggers' property; Microsoft Sentinel automation rules require the 'triggers' structure (incidentTrigger or alertTrigger) instead of 'sources'. Option A is wrong because 'LogicApp' is a valid action type. Option C is wrong because API version is not the issue. Option D is wrong because the resource type is correct.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.