Question 347 of 1,639
Mitigate threats using Microsoft SentinelmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

SC-200 Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of mitigate threats using microsoft sentinel. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which of the following detection scenarios can be implemented using a scheduled analytics rule in Microsoft Sentinel? (Select all that apply.) (Choose 2.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Identifying sign-ins from IP addresses listed in a custom threat intelligence watchlist.

Option A is correct because scheduled analytics rules in Microsoft Sentinel can be configured to run queries at regular intervals, and these queries can reference watchlists, including custom threat intelligence watchlists. By querying sign-in logs and joining them with a watchlist of known malicious IPs, the rule can identify sign-ins from those IPs and generate alerts. This is a common pattern for leveraging external threat intelligence within Sentinel's detection capabilities.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Identifying sign-ins from IP addresses listed in a custom threat intelligence watchlist.

    Why this is correct

    Scheduled rules can reference watchlists in KQL queries to match sign-in IPs against threat intelligence.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Detecting anomalous sign-in behavior based on user entity behavior.

    Why it's wrong here

    Anomaly detection based on UEBA requires an Anomaly analytics rule, not a scheduled rule.

  • Correlating Windows Security Events to detect brute-force attacks.

    Why this is correct

    Scheduled rules can aggregate failed logon events (e.g., Event ID 4625) over time windows to identify brute-force patterns.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Automatically blocking malicious IPs on a firewall.

    Why it's wrong here

    Automated blocking requires a playbook triggered by an automation rule; scheduled rules generate alerts/incidents but do not execute actions themselves.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse detection scenarios with response actions, or assume that all behavioral detection (like UEBA) can be done with scheduled rules, when in fact scheduled rules are only for static, query-based detection, not for machine learning or automated remediation.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Scheduled analytics rules in Microsoft Sentinel use Kusto Query Language (KQL) queries that run on a defined schedule (e.g., every 5 minutes) and can aggregate data over a lookback period. They support watchlist lookups via the `_GetWatchlist()` function, which allows joining against static or dynamic lists of indicators. For brute-force detection (Option C), a scheduled rule can correlate multiple Windows Security Event ID 4625 (failed logon) events from the same source IP within a time window, using `summarize` and `count` to trigger an alert when a threshold is exceeded.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A healthcare organisation deploys an application with a public-facing web tier and a private database tier. The database subnet has no public IP and only accepts connections from the web tier's security group. Questions like this test whether you can design cloud network isolation using VNets/VPCs, subnets, and security group rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel — This question tests Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Identifying sign-ins from IP addresses listed in a custom threat intelligence watchlist. — Option A is correct because scheduled analytics rules in Microsoft Sentinel can be configured to run queries at regular intervals, and these queries can reference watchlists, including custom threat intelligence watchlists. By querying sign-in logs and joining them with a watchlist of known malicious IPs, the rule can identify sign-ins from those IPs and generate alerts. This is a common pattern for leveraging external threat intelligence within Sentinel's detection capabilities.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.