Quick Answer
The answer is the Threat Intelligence integration with analytics rules, because this combination allows you to detect DLL side-loading by importing known adversary indicators of compromise and then writing custom detection rules that trigger on those specific TI data points. In Microsoft Sentinel, the Threat Intelligence feature ingests structured threat data—such as file hashes, IPs, or domains associated with side-loading campaigns—and analytics rules let you operationalize that intelligence into proactive alerts. On the SC-200 exam, this question tests your understanding of how to bridge raw threat feeds with active detection, often appearing as a scenario where a hunter needs to move beyond generic detections. A common trap is confusing UEBA (user behavior) or workbooks (visualization) with actual rule-based detection; remember that analytics rules are the engine for alerting, while playbooks handle response. Memory tip: TI feeds the rules, rules fire the alerts—think “TI + Rule = Detection.”
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of perform threat hunting. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A threat hunter wants to proactively identify devices that may have been compromised by a known adversary using DLL side-loading techniques. Which Microsoft Sentinel solution or feature should the hunter leverage to create custom detection rules based on the latest threat intelligence?
User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
Why wrong: UEBA detects anomalies, not specific TI-based patterns.
Automation rules with playbooks
Why wrong: Playbooks automate response, not initial detection.
Custom workbooks
Why wrong: Workbooks are for visualization, not detection logic.
Threat Intelligence integration with analytics rules
TI indicators can be used in scheduled query rules to match against events.
Answer choices
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Threat Intelligence integration with analytics rules
Option B is correct because Microsoft Sentinel's Threat Intelligence integration allows importing TI indicators and creating analytics rules. Option A is wrong because UEBA focuses on user behavior, not specific TI. Option C is wrong because workbook is for visualization, not detection. Option D is wrong because playbook is for response automation.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
Why it's wrong here
UEBA detects anomalies, not specific TI-based patterns.
Automation rules with playbooks
Why it's wrong here
Playbooks automate response, not initial detection.
Custom workbooks
Why it's wrong here
Workbooks are for visualization, not detection logic.
Threat Intelligence integration with analytics rules
Why this is correct
TI indicators can be used in scheduled query rules to match against events.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Perform threat hunting — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Perform threat hunting — This question tests Perform threat hunting — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
The correct answer is: Threat Intelligence integration with analytics rules — Option B is correct because Microsoft Sentinel's Threat Intelligence integration allows importing TI indicators and creating analytics rules. Option A is wrong because UEBA focuses on user behavior, not specific TI. Option C is wrong because workbook is for visualization, not detection. Option D is wrong because playbook is for response automation.
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.