Question 531 of 1,639
Perform threat huntinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct approach is to ingest Windows Security Event logs (Event ID 4624) from the on-premises server into a Log Analytics workspace and join them with Azure AD SigninLogs on account name and timestamp. This works because Event ID 4624 captures every successful local logon session on the server, including the account name and source IP, while SigninLogs records cloud authentication events for Microsoft 365. By correlating these two datasets on a shared account and a narrow time window, the threat hunter can pinpoint which server’s compromised session led to the anomalous M365 sign-in from a new IP. On the SC-200 exam, this tests your understanding of cross-domain attack correlation event logs—specifically how to bridge on-premises and cloud telemetry using KQL joins. A common trap is choosing DeviceLogonEvents, which only works if the server is onboarded to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, or Sysmon, which requires extra configuration. Memory tip: think “4624 + SigninLogs = bridge the gap” for any on-prem-to-cloud pivot scenario.

SC-200 Perform threat hunting Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of perform threat hunting. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A threat hunter is using Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR to hunt for a potential cross-domain attack where an attacker compromised an on-premises server and then used a privileged account to sign into Microsoft 365 from a new IP. The hunter wants to identify the server using a query that combines Windows Event Logs from the server with Microsoft 365 sign-in logs. Which approach should the hunter take to correlate the data?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Ingest Windows Security Event logs (Event ID 4624) from the server into a Log Analytics workspace, and join with SigninLogs on account name and timestamp

Option A is correct because the server's Security Event ID 4624 (account logon) can be used to identify the logon session, and then the account's IP can be correlated with Azure AD SigninLogs. Option B (DeviceLogonEvents) is for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, not on-premises servers without MDE. Option C (Sysmon) requires additional configuration. Option D (Sentinel watchlist) is static and not suitable for dynamic correlation.

Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Create a Sentinel watchlist of known attacker IPs and compare with server logs

    Why it's wrong here

    Watchlists are static and do not correlate events from different sources dynamically.

  • Enable Sysmon on the server and use its Event ID 3 (network connection) to find the IP

    Why it's wrong here

    Sysmon is not a standard source and requires extra deployment; also network connections are not logon events.

  • Ingest Windows Security Event logs (Event ID 4624) from the server into a Log Analytics workspace, and join with SigninLogs on account name and timestamp

    Why this is correct

    This correlates on-premises logon events with cloud sign-ins to find the compromise path.

    Related concept

    Authentication checks who the user is.

  • Use the DeviceLogonEvents table in Microsoft Defender XDR advanced hunting

    Why it's wrong here

    DeviceLogonEvents is available only if the server is enrolled in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint; not all on-premises servers are.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Key takeaway

Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A healthcare organisation deploys an application with a public-facing web tier and a private database tier. The database subnet has no public IP and only accepts connections from the web tier's security group. Questions like this test whether you can design cloud network isolation using VNets/VPCs, subnets, and security group rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related SC-200 questions on access control and AAA configuration.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Perform threat hunting — This question tests Perform threat hunting — Authentication checks who the user is..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Ingest Windows Security Event logs (Event ID 4624) from the server into a Log Analytics workspace, and join with SigninLogs on account name and timestamp — Option A is correct because the server's Security Event ID 4624 (account logon) can be used to identify the logon session, and then the account's IP can be correlated with Azure AD SigninLogs. Option B (DeviceLogonEvents) is for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, not on-premises servers without MDE. Option C (Sysmon) requires additional configuration. Option D (Sentinel watchlist) is static and not suitable for dynamic correlation.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related SC-200 questions on access control and AAA configuration.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Authentication checks who the user is.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SC-200 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.