- A
When incident is created, and the incident contains a user entity.
Correct. Automation rules can be configured to trigger when an incident is created and match conditions on entity types (e.g., 'User'). This allows the playbook to run automatically for incidents involving the specified user.
- B
When alert is generated, and the alert contains a user entity.
Why wrong: Automation rules on alerts are less common; typically you want to act on incidents. Also, the condition on entities is available at incident level, not directly on alert generation in the same way.
- C
When incident is created with severity high, then run the playbook.
Why wrong: This lacks the entity condition. The rule would run the playbook for all high-severity incidents, not just those containing the specific user entity.
- D
When playbook is triggered manually from the incident details page.
Why wrong: Manual triggering does not automate the response. The requirement is for automated response upon incident creation.
SC-200 Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel Practice Question
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of mitigate threats using microsoft sentinel. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A SOC analyst wants to automate a response in Microsoft Sentinel such that whenever an incident is created containing a specific user entity (e.g., compromised user), a playbook runs that disables the user in Microsoft Entra ID. Which condition should be configured in the automation rule?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
When incident is created, and the incident contains a user entity.
Option A is correct because the automation rule must trigger on incident creation and evaluate whether the incident contains a specific user entity to run the playbook that disables the user in Microsoft Entra ID. This ensures the playbook only executes when the relevant entity is present, aligning with the requirement to automate a response based on a compromised user entity.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
When incident is created, and the incident contains a user entity.
Why this is correct
Correct. Automation rules can be configured to trigger when an incident is created and match conditions on entity types (e.g., 'User'). This allows the playbook to run automatically for incidents involving the specified user.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
When alert is generated, and the alert contains a user entity.
Why it's wrong here
Automation rules on alerts are less common; typically you want to act on incidents. Also, the condition on entities is available at incident level, not directly on alert generation in the same way.
- ✗
When incident is created with severity high, then run the playbook.
Why it's wrong here
This lacks the entity condition. The rule would run the playbook for all high-severity incidents, not just those containing the specific user entity.
- ✗
When playbook is triggered manually from the incident details page.
Why it's wrong here
Manual triggering does not automate the response. The requirement is for automated response upon incident creation.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may confuse alert-level triggers (Option B) with incident-level triggers, or assume severity (Option C) is sufficient without considering entity-specific conditions, leading to over-triggering or missing the precise automation requirement.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel use conditions based on incident properties and entity types; the 'contains a user entity' condition leverages the entity mapping from analytics rules, which extracts entities like user accounts from log data (e.g., Azure AD sign-in logs). Under the hood, the playbook is an Azure Logic App that uses the Microsoft Graph API to disable the user, requiring the automation rule to pass the entity's object ID or UPN as a parameter. A real-world scenario is a brute-force attack where multiple failed sign-ins trigger an incident with the user entity, and the automation rule ensures the account is disabled within seconds, reducing lateral movement risk.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-200 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Manage a security operations environment practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
SC-200 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
SC-200 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
SC-200 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-200 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-200 question test?
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel — This question tests Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: When incident is created, and the incident contains a user entity. — Option A is correct because the automation rule must trigger on incident creation and evaluate whether the incident contains a specific user entity to run the playbook that disables the user in Microsoft Entra ID. This ensures the playbook only executes when the relevant entity is present, aligning with the requirement to automate a response based on a compromised user entity.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.