Quick Answer
The answer is the KQL function find() because it is specifically designed to search across multiple tables for a given pattern, making it the most appropriate tool to hunt for Kerberos golden ticket attacks where anomalous service ticket requests may appear in disparate logs like SecurityEvent, WindowsEvent, or DeviceEvents. Unlike union, which simply stacks tables, find() allows you to pinpoint Kerberos-related anomalies without needing to know which table holds the data, directly addressing the need to identify irregular Ticket Granting Service (TGS) requests that indicate a forged golden ticket. On the SC-200 exam, this question tests your ability to choose the right KQL function for cross-table hunting in Microsoft Sentinel, a common scenario in the “Hunt for threats” domain. A frequent trap is confusing find() with the deprecated search() operator, which is less efficient and not recommended for production queries. Memory tip: think “find it fast across all tables” to recall that find() is your go-to for hunting golden ticket anomalies without merging tables first.
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of perform threat hunting. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A security analyst is using Microsoft Sentinel to hunt for signs of Kerberos golden ticket attacks. Which KQL function is most appropriate to identify anomalous Kerberos service ticket requests?
find
find searches across multiple tables for a pattern, ideal for hunting across diverse logs.
evaluate
Why wrong: evaluate is for plugin functions, not for cross-table search.
search
Why wrong: search is deprecated in KQL in favor of find.
union
Why wrong: Union combines tables but doesn't search across them with a pattern.
Answer choices
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
find
The KQL function find() searches across multiple tables, which is useful for hunting in different logs. Option A (union) is for combining tables, not searching across them. Option C (search) is deprecated. Option D (evaluate) is for plugins. Option B is wrong because it doesn't target Kerberos logs directly.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
find
Why this is correct
find searches across multiple tables for a pattern, ideal for hunting across diverse logs.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
evaluate
Why it's wrong here
evaluate is for plugin functions, not for cross-table search.
search
Why it's wrong here
search is deprecated in KQL in favor of find.
union
Why it's wrong here
Union combines tables but doesn't search across them with a pattern.
Common exam traps
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Perform threat hunting — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Perform threat hunting — This question tests Perform threat hunting — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
The correct answer is: find — The KQL function find() searches across multiple tables, which is useful for hunting in different logs. Option A (union) is for combining tables, not searching across them. Option C (search) is deprecated. Option D (evaluate) is for plugins. Option B is wrong because it doesn't target Kerberos logs directly.
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.