Question 217 of 969

Quick Answer

The answer is an automation rule with incident closure action. This is correct because automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel allow you to define conditions—such as specific alert names, severity levels, or entity types—that, when matched, automatically trigger an incident closure action, effectively handling known false positives without any human intervention. On the Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect exam, this concept tests your understanding of how to operationalize security operations center efficiency by reducing alert fatigue; a common trap is confusing automation rules with playbooks, but remember that playbooks require a Logic App and are better for complex remediation, whereas a simple closure action is handled directly within the rule itself. For a quick memory tip, think “Close with a rule, not a playbook” to distinguish when a straightforward automation rule suffices for false positive suppression.

SC-100 Practice Question: Design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities

This SC-100 practice question tests your understanding of design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your organization uses Microsoft Sentinel for SIEM. You need to ensure that security incidents are automatically responded to without human intervention for known false positives. What should you implement?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

An automation rule with incident closure action

Option D is correct because automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel can be configured to automatically close incidents when specific conditions are met, such as when an incident is identified as a known false positive. This eliminates the need for human intervention by triggering an incident closure action based on predefined criteria, directly addressing the requirement for automated response to false positives.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • An analytics rule with alert suppression

    Why it's wrong here

    Suppresses alerts, but not automatic incident closure.

  • A playbook that runs on incident creation

    Why it's wrong here

    Playbooks often require human approval or manual steps.

  • An entity behavior analytics rule

    Why it's wrong here

    Identifies anomalies, doesn't auto-close.

  • An automation rule with incident closure action

    Why this is correct

    Automation rules can auto-close incidents based on conditions.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse alert suppression (which prevents duplicate alerts) with incident closure automation, or they assume a playbook is always required for automation, when in fact a simple automation rule with a closure action is the direct and correct solution for automatically handling known false positives.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel operate at the incident level and can evaluate conditions such as incident title, severity, or custom tags. When a known false positive pattern is identified—for example, an incident with a specific title like 'Known False Positive: Test Alert'—the automation rule can trigger an incident closure action with a classification of 'FalsePositive' and a comment, ensuring the incident is automatically resolved without analyst review. This leverages the incident's properties and the rule's condition logic to achieve zero-touch response for predictable scenarios.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SC-100 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities.

Design security operations, identity, and compliance capabilities practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design security operations, identity, and compliance capabilities.

Design security solutions for infrastructure practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design security solutions for infrastructure.

Design a Zero Trust strategy and architecture practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design a Zero Trust strategy and architecture.

Design security solutions for applications and data practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design security solutions for applications and data.

Evaluate GRC and security operations strategies practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Evaluate GRC and security operations strategies.

Design security for infrastructure practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design security for infrastructure.

Design a strategy for data and applications practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Design a strategy for data and applications.

Recommend security best practices and priorities practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to Recommend security best practices and priorities.

SC-100 fundamentals practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to SC-100 fundamentals.

SC-100 scenario practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to SC-100 scenario.

SC-100 troubleshooting practice questions

Practise SC-100 questions linked to SC-100 troubleshooting.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-100 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-100 question test?

Design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities — This question tests Design solutions that align with security best practices and priorities — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: An automation rule with incident closure action — Option D is correct because automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel can be configured to automatically close incidents when specific conditions are met, such as when an incident is identified as a known false positive. This eliminates the need for human intervention by triggering an incident closure action based on predefined criteria, directly addressing the requirement for automated response to false positives.

What should I do if I get this SC-100 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

2 more ways this is tested on SC-100

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Your organization uses Microsoft Sentinel for security operations. You need to design a solution to automatically respond to a DDoS attack detected by Azure DDoS Protection. The response should include blocking the attacker's IP address in Azure Firewall and sending an alert to the security team. Which approach should you use?

hard
  • A.Configure an alert rule in Azure Monitor to send an email to the security team
  • B.Use Azure Policy to deny network traffic from the attacker's IP range
  • C.Configure a resource lock on the Azure Firewall to prevent changes
  • D.Create an automation rule in Microsoft Sentinel that triggers a playbook to block the IP in Azure Firewall

Why D: Option D is correct because Microsoft Sentinel automation rules can trigger a playbook (an Azure Logic App) when a DDoS attack detection alert fires. The playbook can execute an action to block the attacker's IP address in Azure Firewall via its REST API or PowerShell cmdlets, and simultaneously send an alert to the security team (e.g., via email or Teams). This provides an automated, orchestrated response directly from the SIEM, aligning with security operations best practices.

Variation 2. Your organization uses Microsoft Sentinel for security operations. The SOC team wants to automatically disable a compromised user account in Microsoft Entra ID when a high-severity alert is generated. Which automation method should you use?

hard
  • A.An automation rule with a playbook
  • B.A workbook
  • C.A KQL query in a hunting rule
  • D.An analytics rule

Why A: Automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel can trigger a playbook (an Azure Logic Apps workflow) when a high-severity alert fires. The playbook can then execute an action to disable the user account in Microsoft Entra ID via the Microsoft Graph API. This is the correct method because it provides the necessary integration between Sentinel alerts and Entra ID identity remediation.

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-100 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-100 exam.