mediumMultiple Select
PL-900 Practice Question: Which TWO features are available in Power Pages…
Which TWO features are available in Power Pages to customize the appearance and behavior of a site without writing custom code?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Power Pages Studio
Power Pages Studio (A) is correct because it is the browser-based, no-code design environment where makers visually edit pages, sections, components, forms, and lists, and configure site behavior through built-in settings rather than code. The Theme editor (C) is correct because it provides a no-code interface for selecting and customizing colors, typography, buttons, and other styling tokens that apply consistently across the site. Custom JavaScript (B), Custom CSS (D), and Liquid templates (E) are all code-based customization mechanisms, so they require writing code and therefore do not satisfy the 'without writing custom code' requirement.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Power Pages Studio
Why this is correct
Power Pages Studio provides a no-code visual interface for editing site pages, layouts, styling and component behaviour, satisfying the stem's requirement to customise appearance and behaviour without writing code. It is the primary design surface for makers, so it qualifies as one of the two correct features.
- ✗
Custom JavaScript
Why it's wrong here
Custom JavaScript requires writing code, so it cannot satisfy a no-code requirement; Power Pages instead offers the styling workspace and configuration settings. It is tempting because JavaScript genuinely customises behaviour, and would be the right choice when bespoke client-side logic is permitted.
- ✓
Theme editor
Why this is correct
The theme editor provides a no-code interface for changing colours, typography, and branding across a Power Pages site, satisfying the stem's constraint of customising appearance without writing custom code. It applies styling through predefined design tokens rather than requiring CSS or Liquid edits.
- ✗
Custom CSS
Why it's wrong here
Custom CSS is styling code authored by the maker, so it requires writing CSS rather than configuring built-in no-code options. It tempts because it genuinely customises appearance, and would be correct when a site needs bespoke visual styling beyond the standard themes and component settings Power Pages exposes through the design studio.
- ✗
Liquid templates
Why it's wrong here
Liquid templates are a server-side templating language requiring hand-written markup and logic, so they constitute custom code. They tempt because they customise behaviour and content rendering, and would be the right choice when a maker must dynamically query Dataverse or transform output beyond what the no-code portal components provide.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This PL-900 question is part of Courseiva's 701-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PL-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PL-900 exam.