Question 307 of 985

MS-900 Practice Question: Describe security, compliance, privacy, and trust in Microsoft 365

This MS-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe security, compliance, privacy, and trust in microsoft 365. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A legal team needs to preserve all data belonging to a former employee who is involved in litigation. The preservation must cover Exchange Online email, SharePoint sites, Teams messages, and OneDrive files. Which Microsoft Purview solution should they use to enforce the preservation?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

eDiscovery (Standard) case hold

eDiscovery (Standard) case hold is the correct solution because it allows legal teams to place a legal hold on all data sources associated with a specific user, including Exchange Online mailboxes, SharePoint sites, OneDrive accounts, and Teams messages. This preserves the data in its current state, preventing modification or deletion, which is essential for litigation. Unlike other options, eDiscovery holds are designed specifically for legal preservation scenarios and can target multiple workloads simultaneously.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • eDiscovery (Standard) case hold

    Why this is correct

    eDiscovery (Standard) enables creating a case and placing a hold on custodians' mailboxes, SharePoint sites, OneDrive, and Teams, preserving all data for legal purposes.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Data Lifecycle Management retention policy

    Why it's wrong here

    Retention policies are designed for managing data lifecycle at a broad scope (e.g., all mailboxes), not for placing targeted holds on a specific user's data across services.

  • Sensitivity label with retention marking

    Why it's wrong here

    Sensitivity labels can apply retention markings, but they must be manually or automatically applied to each item, and they do not provide a unified hold across all user data.

  • Audit log search

    Why it's wrong here

    Audit logs record activities but do not preserve or hold data; they are used for investigation after an event.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse a retention policy (which is automated and rule-based) with a legal hold (which is manual, case-specific, and preserves data for litigation), leading them to choose Data Lifecycle Management instead of eDiscovery.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

When a legal hold is applied via an eDiscovery case, Microsoft 365 uses a hidden, non-editable copy of the data (the 'preservation vault') to ensure that even if a user deletes items, they remain accessible to eDiscovery managers. This hold overrides any retention or deletion policies configured in Data Lifecycle Management, making it the authoritative mechanism for litigation scenarios. In practice, the hold is applied at the mailbox level via the `Set-Mailbox -LitigationHoldEnabled` cmdlet for Exchange, and for SharePoint/OneDrive, it preserves all versions and changes in the site's preservation hold library.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MS-900 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MS-900 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MS-900 question test?

Describe security, compliance, privacy, and trust in Microsoft 365 — This question tests Describe security, compliance, privacy, and trust in Microsoft 365 — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: eDiscovery (Standard) case hold — eDiscovery (Standard) case hold is the correct solution because it allows legal teams to place a legal hold on all data sources associated with a specific user, including Exchange Online mailboxes, SharePoint sites, OneDrive accounts, and Teams messages. This preserves the data in its current state, preventing modification or deletion, which is essential for litigation. Unlike other options, eDiscovery holds are designed specifically for legal preservation scenarios and can target multiple workloads simultaneously.

What should I do if I get this MS-900 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MS-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-900 exam.