Courseiva

MS-102 Automatic attack disruption Practice Question

Your organization uses Microsoft Defender XDR. You need to configure automatic attack disruption for SaaS applications. Which Microsoft 365 security solution provides this capability?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often confuse Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps with other Defender products. Remember that automatic attack disruption for SaaS is unique to Defender for Cloud Apps.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Option B) provides automatic attack disruption for SaaS applications by using risk indicators and automation to stop attacks in real time. Option A (Microsoft Defender for Identity) focuses on on-premises Active Directory and identity threats, not SaaS apps. Option C (Microsoft Defender for Office 365) protects email and collaboration tools. Option D (Microsoft Defender for Endpoint) secures endpoints like desktops and servers. Therefore, only option B delivers the required capability.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Microsoft Defender for Identity

    Why it's wrong here

    Defender for Identity monitors on-premises Active Directory domain controllers for identity-based attacks; it cannot disrupt SaaS app sessions. It is tempting because identity signals feed attack disruption, but the SaaS-specific capability belongs to Defender for Cloud Apps, which correlates app sessions and suspends compromised accounts.

  • ✓

    Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

    Why this is correct

    Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps delivers automatic attack disruption for SaaS apps by correlating signals from Microsoft Entra ID and Defender XDR to identify compromised sessions or malicious OAuth apps, then containing the threat mid-attack. This satisfies the stem's requirement for a Microsoft 365 security solution providing SaaS-specific disruption.

  • ✗

    Microsoft Defender for Office 365

    Why it's wrong here

    Defender for Office 365 protects email and collaboration workloads; it does not deliver automatic attack disruption for SaaS apps. It is tempting because it is part of Microsoft Defender XDR, and it is correct for phishing, malware and collaboration threat protection, but SaaS disruption requires Defender for Cloud Apps.

  • ✗

    Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

    Why it's wrong here

    Defender for Endpoint isolates and remediates devices, not SaaS application sessions; its automated response targets endpoints. It is tempting because attack disruption uses endpoint signals, but containing a compromised SaaS user requires Defender for Cloud Apps, which enforces session and app-level controls.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 712 original MS-102 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This MS-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-102 exam.