Courseiva
Develop data processing →hardMultiple Choice

DP-203 Develop data processing Practice Question

You have a streaming pipeline using Azure Stream Analytics that ingests data from Event Hubs and outputs to Azure Synapse Analytics. The job has a high watermark delay and is falling behind. You need to reduce the latency. Which action should you take?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Increase the number of Streaming Units (SUs) for the Stream Analytics job.

Increasing the number of Streaming Units (SUs) for the Stream Analytics job allocates more compute resources, reducing latency. Adding more Event Hubs partitions may improve throughput but not directly reduce latency if the job is already bottlenecked. Switching to reference data input does not help. Using Azure Functions for output may add overhead.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Add more partitions to the Event Hubs.

    Why it's wrong here

    Event Hubs partitions are fixed at creation; adding partitions requires recreating the namespace or event hub, and partition count governs consumer parallelism, not the Stream Analytics job's own processing latency. Partition scaling suits provisioning a new hub for higher ingest throughput.

  • ✓

    Increase the number of Streaming Units (SUs) for the Stream Analytics job.

    Why this is correct

    Streaming Units provision compute and throughput for the job; insufficient SUs cause the watermark delay to grow as the job falls behind. Increasing SUs adds parallel processing capacity, directly reducing latency, whereas partitioning or query changes alone may not resolve resource starvation.

  • ✗

    Replace the output with Azure Functions for each event.

    Why it's wrong here

    Per-event Azure Functions invocation adds per-call overhead and cannot match Stream Analytics throughput, worsening the watermark delay rather than reducing it. Functions suit event-driven processing or orchestration, not high-volume streaming sinks. Increasing streaming units or partitioning the output restores throughput.

  • ✗

    Change the input to a reference data input.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reference data is static lookup data joined to the stream, so switching the Event Hubs input to reference data removes the streaming source entirely and cannot lower watermark delay. Reference inputs suit enriching events with slowly changing lookup tables, not high-throughput ingestion.

Quick reference

Cloud Service Model Comparison

ModelYou ManageProvider ManagesExamples
IaaSOS, runtime, apps, dataHardware, hypervisor, networkingEC2, Azure VMs, GCP Compute Engine
PaaSApps and dataOS, runtime, middleware, hardwareElastic Beanstalk, Azure App Service
SaaSData and settings onlyEverything elseMicrosoft 365, Salesforce, Workday
FaaS / ServerlessFunction code onlyInfra, scaling, runtimeLambda, Azure Functions, Cloud Run
CaaSContainers and appsKubernetes, OS, hardwareEKS, AKS, GKE

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 509 original DP-203 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DP-203 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DP-203 exam.