A healthcare organization stores patient records in Azure Blob Storage. They require that data remains available even if an entire Azure datacenter fails, and they also need to ensure data is replicated within the same region for low latency. Which storage redundancy option should they choose?
ZRS replicates data across availability zones within the same region, protecting against datacenter failures while maintaining low latency.
Why this answer
Zone-Redundant Storage (ZRS) synchronously replicates data across three Azure availability zones within the same region, ensuring data remains available even if an entire datacenter (one zone) fails. This meets both the availability requirement and the low-latency requirement because replication stays within the region, avoiding cross-region latency.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'surviving a datacenter failure' with needing geo-redundancy, but ZRS within the same region is sufficient and avoids the latency penalty of cross-region replication.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because Locally Redundant Storage (LRS) replicates data only within a single datacenter, so it cannot survive an entire datacenter failure. Option C is wrong because Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) replicates data to a secondary region, which introduces cross-region latency and does not guarantee low latency within the same region. Option D is wrong because Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS) also replicates to a secondary region and adds read access to the secondary copy, but still incurs cross-region latency and does not meet the 'same region' requirement.