- A
Add a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access'.
A sign-in from a known malicious IP is considered high risk by Identity Protection. Using the sign-in risk condition with 'High' and blocking access achieves the requirement.
- B
Add a condition for 'Locations' and specify the known malicious IP ranges as 'Blocked locations'.
Why wrong: While this could block specific IPs, it is static and does not leverage Identity Protection. The requirement is to use Identity Protection's detection.
- C
Add a condition for 'User risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Require multi-factor authentication'.
Why wrong: User risk is related to compromised user accounts, not sign-in from malicious IPs. Also, it requires MFA, not block access.
- D
Add a condition for 'Device state' set to 'Not compliant' and a grant control of 'Block access'.
Why wrong: Device state is not related to sign-in risk from malicious IPs. This would block non-compliant devices, not specific risky sign-ins.
AZ-500 Manage identity and access Practice Question
This AZ-500 practice question tests your understanding of manage identity and access. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company has Azure AD Identity Protection enabled. The security team wants to automatically block sign-ins that are detected as coming from a known malicious IP address. They have created a Conditional Access policy and assigned it to all users. Which configuration should they add to the policy to trigger the block based on Identity Protection risk?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Add a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access'.
Option A is correct because Identity Protection detects sign-ins from known malicious IP addresses and assigns a 'Sign-in risk' level (e.g., High). By adding a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access', the Conditional Access policy will automatically block those sign-ins. This directly uses Identity Protection's risk detection to enforce the block without needing to manually maintain IP address lists.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Add a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access'.
Why this is correct
A sign-in from a known malicious IP is considered high risk by Identity Protection. Using the sign-in risk condition with 'High' and blocking access achieves the requirement.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Add a condition for 'Locations' and specify the known malicious IP ranges as 'Blocked locations'.
Why it's wrong here
While this could block specific IPs, it is static and does not leverage Identity Protection. The requirement is to use Identity Protection's detection.
- ✗
Add a condition for 'User risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Require multi-factor authentication'.
- ✗
Add a condition for 'Device state' set to 'Not compliant' and a grant control of 'Block access'.
Why it's wrong here
Device state is not related to sign-in risk from malicious IPs. This would block non-compliant devices, not specific risky sign-ins.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'Sign-in risk' (based on the sign-in event's characteristics like IP) with 'User risk' (based on user account compromise likelihood), leading them to incorrectly choose Option C or to think that manually listing IPs in Locations (Option B) is the correct approach.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Identity Protection evaluates sign-in risk in real-time using Microsoft's threat intelligence and machine learning models, assigning risk levels (Low, Medium, High) based on signals like anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel, and known malicious IPs. The 'Sign-in risk' condition in Conditional Access allows policies to react to these risk levels dynamically, whereas static IP blocking (Option B) would miss new or rotating malicious IPs. In a real-world scenario, an organization might combine 'Sign-in risk: High' with 'Block access' to automatically stop attacks from known botnets or Tor exit nodes without manual intervention.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Manage identity and access — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Manage identity and access practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-500 questions
1,000 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate AZ-500 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-500 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-500 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Secure identity and access practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure identity and access.
Secure compute, storage, and databases practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure compute, storage, and databases.
Secure Azure using Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure Azure using Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Sentinel.
Manage identity and access practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Manage identity and access.
Secure networking practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure networking.
AZ-500 fundamentals practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 fundamentals.
AZ-500 scenario practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 scenario.
AZ-500 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-500 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-500 question test?
Manage identity and access — This question tests Manage identity and access — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Add a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access'. — Option A is correct because Identity Protection detects sign-ins from known malicious IP addresses and assigns a 'Sign-in risk' level (e.g., High). By adding a condition for 'Sign-in risk' set to 'High' and a grant control of 'Block access', the Conditional Access policy will automatically block those sign-ins. This directly uses Identity Protection's risk detection to enforce the block without needing to manually maintain IP address lists.
What should I do if I get this AZ-500 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This AZ-500 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-500 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.