- A
Enable Microsoft Entra ID Protection to automatically block guest accounts after 90 days of inactivity. Create manual access reviews for each site using PowerShell.
Why wrong: Identity Protection does not manage inactivity-based cleanup or access reviews.
- B
Use Microsoft Purview to create an auto-labeling policy for PHI data. Assign site owners as reviewers and manually remove inactive guests.
Why wrong: Purview is for data classification, not access reviews or guest management.
- C
Create an access review for the security group containing users with access to PHI sites. Assign reviewers as group owners (site owners). Set frequency to quarterly. Configure external collaboration settings to automatically remove guest accounts that have not signed in for 90 days.
Access reviews for groups allow site owners to review access. Inactive guest removal is configured in external settings.
- D
Create a PIM access review for the SharePoint administrator role. Set frequency to quarterly. Configure Microsoft Entra ID to automatically delete guest accounts after 90 days of inactivity.
Why wrong: PIM access reviews are for privileged roles, not for all users with access to specific sites.
Quick Answer
The correct answer is to create an access review for the security group containing users with access to PHI sites, assign site owners as reviewers, set the frequency to quarterly, and configure external collaboration settings to automatically remove inactive guest accounts after 90 days. This works because Entra ID access reviews can target groups that map to SharePoint site permissions, allowing delegated review to site owners while meeting HIPAA’s logging and monitoring requirements for protected health information. On the AZ-500 exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish between access reviews for general resource access versus Privileged Identity Management (PIM) reviews for roles—a common trap is choosing PIM, which only covers privileged identities, not standard SharePoint users. The inactive guest cleanup is handled separately under Entra ID’s external collaboration settings, not through manual removal or Identity Protection. Memory tip: think “group review for PHI, external settings for guest expiry”—two distinct controls for two distinct compliance needs.
AZ-500 Secure identity and access Practice Question
This AZ-500 practice question tests your understanding of secure identity and access. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
You are a security administrator for a healthcare organization that uses Microsoft Entra ID and Microsoft 365. The organization must comply with HIPAA regulations, which require that access to protected health information (PHI) is logged and monitored. You need to configure access reviews for all users who have access to SharePoint Online sites containing PHI. The reviews must occur quarterly and be assigned to the respective site owners. Additionally, you need to ensure that inactive guest accounts are automatically removed after 90 days of inactivity. Which actions should you take?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Create an access review for the security group containing users with access to PHI sites. Assign reviewers as group owners (site owners). Set frequency to quarterly. Configure external collaboration settings to automatically remove guest accounts that have not signed in for 90 days.
Option A is correct because access reviews can be configured for groups and applications, assigned to site owners, and set to quarterly frequency. Inactive guest cleanup is configured in Entra ID external settings. Option B is wrong because PIM access reviews are for privileged roles, not general access to SharePoint sites. Option C is wrong because Identity Protection does not manage access reviews. Option D is wrong because manual removal of guests is not automated and does not scale.
Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Enable Microsoft Entra ID Protection to automatically block guest accounts after 90 days of inactivity. Create manual access reviews for each site using PowerShell.
Why it's wrong here
Identity Protection does not manage inactivity-based cleanup or access reviews.
- ✗
Use Microsoft Purview to create an auto-labeling policy for PHI data. Assign site owners as reviewers and manually remove inactive guests.
Why it's wrong here
Purview is for data classification, not access reviews or guest management.
- ✓
Create an access review for the security group containing users with access to PHI sites. Assign reviewers as group owners (site owners). Set frequency to quarterly. Configure external collaboration settings to automatically remove guest accounts that have not signed in for 90 days.
Why this is correct
Access reviews for groups allow site owners to review access. Inactive guest removal is configured in external settings.
Related concept
Authentication checks who the user is.
- ✗
Create a PIM access review for the SharePoint administrator role. Set frequency to quarterly. Configure Microsoft Entra ID to automatically delete guest accounts after 90 days of inactivity.
Why it's wrong here
PIM access reviews are for privileged roles, not for all users with access to specific sites.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization
Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Authentication checks who the user is.
- Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
- Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
- AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.
TExam Day Tips
- Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
- Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
- Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.
Key takeaway
Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related AZ-500 questions on access control and AAA configuration.
- →
Secure identity and access — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Secure identity and access practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-500 questions
1,000 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate AZ-500 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-500 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-500 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Secure identity and access practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure identity and access.
Secure compute, storage, and databases practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure compute, storage, and databases.
Secure Azure using Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure Azure using Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Sentinel.
Manage identity and access practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Manage identity and access.
Secure networking practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to Secure networking.
AZ-500 fundamentals practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 fundamentals.
AZ-500 scenario practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 scenario.
AZ-500 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise AZ-500 questions linked to AZ-500 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-500 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-500 question test?
Secure identity and access — This question tests Secure identity and access — Authentication checks who the user is..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Create an access review for the security group containing users with access to PHI sites. Assign reviewers as group owners (site owners). Set frequency to quarterly. Configure external collaboration settings to automatically remove guest accounts that have not signed in for 90 days. — Option A is correct because access reviews can be configured for groups and applications, assigned to site owners, and set to quarterly frequency. Inactive guest cleanup is configured in Entra ID external settings. Option B is wrong because PIM access reviews are for privileged roles, not general access to SharePoint sites. Option C is wrong because Identity Protection does not manage access reviews. Option D is wrong because manual removal of guests is not automated and does not scale.
What should I do if I get this AZ-500 question wrong?
Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related AZ-500 questions on access control and AAA configuration.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Authentication checks who the user is.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More AZ-500 practice questions
- A public web application should be protected from OWASP-style attacks and network-layer DDoS attacks. Which two Azure se…
- A security analyst uses Microsoft Defender for Cloud. They want to view a list of all security recommendations for their…
- A company uses Azure AD B2B collaboration to invite external vendors. They want to restrict the vendors to only be able…
- A company uses Defender for Servers Plan 2. Which two capabilities are included compared with a basic posture-only confi…
- A Sentinel detection should enrich alerts with business-critical asset context. Which two mechanisms are appropriate?
- A company uses Microsoft Defender for Cloud to manage its security posture. The compliance team wants to monitor the sub…
Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026
This AZ-500 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-500 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.