Courseiva

AZ-305 Design business continuity solutions Practice Question

Exhibit

{
  "properties": {
    "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
    "recoveryServicesProvider": {
      "id": "/Subscriptions/.../resourceGroups/.../providers/Microsoft.RecoveryServices/vaults/.../replicationFabrics/.../replicationRecoveryServicesProviders/..."
    },
    "primaryFabricFriendlyName": "onprem-fabric",
    "recoveryFabricFriendlyName": "azure-fabric",
    "primaryFabricProvider": "HyperVSite",
    "replicationHealth": "Critical",
    "testFailoverState": "None",
    "currentProtectionState": "PlannedFailoverCompleted"
  },
  "id": "/.../replicationProtectedItems/...",
  "name": "vm-critical"
}

Refer to the exhibit. The JSON snippet shows the properties of a replication-protected item in Azure Site Recovery. What is the MOST LIKELY reason for the replication health being 'Critical'?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates assume 'Critical' replication health always indicates a technical failure (e.g., network or storage issues), but in Azure Site Recovery, a planned failover intentionally stops replication, causing the health to become 'Critical' as a normal post-failover state.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

A planned failover was completed, stopping replication

When a planned failover is completed in Azure Site Recovery, replication is automatically stopped and the replication health status changes to 'Critical' because the protected item is no longer actively replicating to the recovery region. This is expected behavior after a planned failover, as the source and target are now synchronized and replication is disabled to prevent data overwrites. The 'Critical' health indicator in this context reflects the intentional cessation of replication, not a fault.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The replication storage account is misconfigured

    Why it's wrong here

    A misconfigured replication storage account—such as an incorrect key, disabled firewall, or expired SAS token—would prevent Azure Site Recovery from writing replicated data to the target account, producing job errors and a protection state like 'ReplicationNotHealthy' or 'ConfigurationNotFound' rather than a failover-completed marker. The reported state 'PlannedFailoverCompleted' indicates the failover workflow itself ran to completion, which is the action that intentionally stops replication. Since this state results from a successful orchestrated failover rather than a storage-level failure, misconfiguration is not the root cause of the critical health indicator.

  • ✗

    There is a network connectivity issue between the on-premises site and Azure

    Why it's wrong here

    If network connectivity between the on-premises configuration server/protected infrastructure and Azure were lost, ongoing replication would fail with errors such as 'ReplicationError' or 'JournalGap', and the protection state would reflect an unhealthy replication relationship, not a completed failover. A planned failover requires a healthy control channel to orchestrate the shutdown, final replication, and cutover steps; without that connectivity the failover would remain stuck or fail entirely. Therefore, a successful 'PlannedFailoverCompleted' state is inconsistent with a network connectivity issue at the time of reporting.

  • ✓

    A planned failover was completed, stopping replication

    Why this is correct

    Azure Site Recovery intentionally stops the continuous replication stream during a planned failover to guarantee that no data written after the cutover is replicated; once this completes, the protection state is set to 'PlannedFailoverCompleted'. The replication health automatically becomes 'Critical' because the active replication link is no longer transferring data—this is an expected result of the failover lifecycle, not a sign of misconfiguration or infrastructure failure. To restore a healthy state, you must commit or reverse the failover and then re-protect the workload, which establishes a fresh replication relationship; until then, the critical health flag correctly indicates that replication is stopped.

  • ✗

    A test failover was initiated but not cleaned up

    Why it's wrong here

    A test failover launches an isolated, sandboxed copy of the replicated VM in Azure without disturbing the ongoing replication from on-premises, and its lifecycle is tracked by properties such as testFailoverState. The JSON snippet shows 'testFailoverState': 'None', which means no test failover is currently in progress and none was left without cleanup. Even if a test failover had been initiated and not cleaned up, it would not set the protection state to 'PlannedFailoverCompleted' nor stop replication; it would leave the state as 'TestFailover' or 'TestFailoverCompleted' and replication health would remain healthy because the underlying replication continues uninterrupted.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 795 original AZ-305 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.