Question 423 of 999

Quick Answer

The answer is Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews. This feature is correct because it provides a built-in mechanism to schedule recurring quarterly access reviews for role assignments and automatically removes any assignments that reviewers do not approve, directly fulfilling the requirement for both periodic review and automated cleanup. On the Microsoft Azure Solutions Architect Expert AZ-305 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of identity governance and how to enforce least-privilege access at scale, often appearing as a distractor against manual review processes or Privileged Identity Management (PIM) alone—remember that PIM handles just-in-time activation, not recurring reviews with automatic removal. A common trap is choosing “Entra ID Privileged Identity Management” because it also manages roles, but PIM lacks the native recurring review and auto-removal workflow for unapproved assignments. Memory tip: think “Access Reviews = Review + Auto-Remove,” while “PIM = Just-in-Time + Approval.”

AZ-305 Practice Question: Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions

This AZ-305 practice question tests your understanding of design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your company uses Microsoft Entra ID and has a custom application that requires users to have specific roles assigned. You need to ensure that role assignments are reviewed quarterly and automatically remove assignments that are not approved. Which feature should you use?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews

Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews enable you to create recurring reviews of role assignments, with automatic removal of assignments that reviewers do not approve. This directly meets the requirement for quarterly reviews and automatic removal of unapproved assignments, making it the correct choice.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management

    Why it's wrong here

    PIM provides time-bound and approved access, but access reviews are part of Entra ID Governance.

  • Microsoft Entra Identity Protection

    Why it's wrong here

    Identity Protection detects and responds to identity risks, not role reviews.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews

    Why this is correct

    Access reviews allow periodic review of role assignments and automatic removal.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Microsoft Entra Conditional Access

    Why it's wrong here

    Conditional Access controls access based on conditions, not review of assignments.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Privileged Identity Management (PIM) with access reviews, but PIM handles just-in-time activation and approval, not recurring reviews with automatic removal of unapproved assignments.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Access reviews in Microsoft Entra ID Governance leverage the Azure AD Graph API and Microsoft Graph to evaluate group memberships and application role assignments against a defined schedule. The automatic removal action uses a 'remove assignment' setting that triggers a background job to delete the assignment from the directory, which is logged in the audit logs for compliance. In a real-world scenario, this is critical for organizations subject to regulations like SOX or GDPR, where stale privileged access must be periodically certified and revoked.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-305 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — This question tests Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews — Microsoft Entra ID Governance access reviews enable you to create recurring reviews of role assignments, with automatic removal of assignments that reviewers do not approve. This directly meets the requirement for quarterly reviews and automatic removal of unapproved assignments, making it the correct choice.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.