mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A company wants to configure policies that detect risky sign-ins (e.g., from anonymous IPs or unfamiliar locations) and automatically require multi-factor authentication (MFA) when such risk is detected. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they use to create these policies?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A company wants to configure policies that detect risky sign-ins (e.g., from anonymous IPs or unfamiliar locations) and automatically require multi-factor authentication (MFA) when such risk is detected. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they use to create these policies?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Audit Logs

Audit Logs provide logs of activities but do not allow policy creation or automatic enforcement.

B

Best answer

Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access

Conditional Access policies can use risk conditions such as 'Sign-in risk level' to require MFA or block access, integrating with Identity Protection.

C

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Identity Protection

Identity Protection identifies risky sign-ins but does not directly enforce controls; it provides signals for Conditional Access.

D

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management

PIM manages activation of administrative roles, not general user sign-in risk policies.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access — Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies can incorporate sign-in risk conditions (from Identity Protection) to enforce MFA. While Identity Protection detects risk, the enforcement is done via Conditional Access. PIM handles privileged role activation, Audit Logs provide reporting, and SSPR is for password reset.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.