Question 272 of 999

AZ-305 Practice Question: Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions

This AZ-305 practice question tests your understanding of design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company uses Microsoft Entra ID (Microsoft Entra ID) for identity management. They want to automatically detect sign-in risks such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations, anonymous IP addresses, or leaked credentials. Based on the risk level, they want to apply different controls: for low-risk sign-ins, show a message but allow access; for medium-risk sign-ins, require multi-factor authentication (MFA); for high-risk sign-ins, block the sign-in. They also need to receive a weekly summary report of risk events. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they configure?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk conditions

Option B is correct because Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies can integrate sign-in risk conditions from Identity Protection to enforce granular controls based on risk levels. This allows you to configure actions such as showing a message for low risk, requiring MFA for medium risk, and blocking access for high risk, while Identity Protection provides the weekly summary report of risk events.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Identity Protection policies

    Why it's wrong here

    Identity Protection provides risk detection and a risk-based conditional access policy (user risk and sign-in risk) but the actual enforcement (block, MFA) requires Conditional Access policies. Identity Protection alone does not enforce access controls.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk conditions

    Why this is correct

    Conditional Access policies can evaluate sign-in risk levels (low, medium, high) from Identity Protection and apply granular controls such as block, require MFA, or session controls. Combined with Identity Protection reports, you get the weekly summary.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews

    Why it's wrong here

    Access Reviews are used to periodically review group memberships or application access, not to detect and respond to sign-in risks in real time.

  • Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

    Why it's wrong here

    PIM manages just-in-time privileged role activation and does not provide detection or response to sign-in risks.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Identity Protection (the detection engine) with Conditional Access (the enforcement engine), assuming Identity Protection alone can apply the per-risk-level controls, when in reality Conditional Access policies are required to map risk levels to specific actions like MFA or block.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, Identity Protection calculates a sign-in risk level (low, medium, high) using machine learning models that analyze signals like anonymous IP addresses (from Tor or VPNs), atypical travel, and leaked credentials. Conditional Access policies then evaluate this risk as a condition during authentication, allowing you to assign different access controls per risk level via the 'Grant' or 'Session' controls. The weekly summary report is generated by Identity Protection's reporting engine, which aggregates risk detections over the past seven days.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-305 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — This question tests Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk conditions — Option B is correct because Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies can integrate sign-in risk conditions from Identity Protection to enforce granular controls based on risk levels. This allows you to configure actions such as showing a message for low risk, requiring MFA for medium risk, and blocking access for high risk, while Identity Protection provides the weekly summary report of risk events.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.