mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A company uses Microsoft Entra ID (Microsoft Entra ID) for identity management. They want to automatically detect sign-in risks such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations, anonymous IP addresses, or leaked credentials. Based on the risk level, they want to apply different controls: for low-risk sign-ins, show a message but allow access; for medium-risk sign-ins, require multi-factor authentication (MFA); for high-risk sign-ins, block the sign-in. They also need to receive a weekly summary report of risk events. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they configure?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A company uses Microsoft Entra ID (Microsoft Entra ID) for identity management. They want to automatically detect sign-in risks such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations, anonymous IP addresses, or leaked credentials. Based on the risk level, they want to apply different controls: for low-risk sign-ins, show a message but allow access; for medium-risk sign-ins, require multi-factor authentication (MFA); for high-risk sign-ins, block the sign-in. They also need to receive a weekly summary report of risk events. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they configure?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Identity Protection policies

Identity Protection provides risk detection and a risk-based conditional access policy (user risk and sign-in risk) but the actual enforcement (block, MFA) requires Conditional Access policies. Identity Protection alone does not enforce access controls.

B

Best answer

Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk conditions

Conditional Access policies can evaluate sign-in risk levels (low, medium, high) from Identity Protection and apply granular controls such as block, require MFA, or session controls. Combined with Identity Protection reports, you get the weekly summary.

C

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Access Reviews

Access Reviews are used to periodically review group memberships or application access, not to detect and respond to sign-in risks in real time.

D

Distractor review

Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

PIM manages just-in-time privileged role activation and does not provide detection or response to sign-in risks.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-305 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-305 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk conditions — Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies can use sign-in risk from Identity Protection as a condition. You can create three separate policies targeting different risk levels: low, medium, high. Each policy can apply different access controls (e.g., block, require MFA, or only report). Identity Protection itself provides reports and dashboards but does not block or require MFA on its own; it needs Conditional Access to enforce actions. Access Reviews and Privileged Identity Management do not address sign-in risk controls.

What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.