Question 565 of 1,170
Deploy and Manage Azure ComputehardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

AZ-104 Deploy and Manage Azure Compute Practice Question

This AZ-104 practice question tests your understanding of deploy and manage azure compute. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A developer has the Contributor role on a resource group. A Bicep deployment that creates a VM with a public IP fails with a policy denial, but the same template succeeds after the public IP resource is removed. Which two statements are true? Select two.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The Contributor role allows deployments in the resource group, but it cannot override a deny policy inherited from a higher scope.

Option A is correct because the Contributor role grants full management access to resources within the resource group, but it cannot override Azure Policy effects such as 'deny'. Policy inheritance flows from higher scopes (management group, subscription) down to the resource group, and even a Contributor cannot bypass a deny policy assigned at a higher scope. The Bicep deployment fails specifically because the public IP resource violates a policy rule, not because of a lack of permissions on the role itself.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The Contributor role allows deployments in the resource group, but it cannot override a deny policy inherited from a higher scope.

    Why this is correct

    Contributor grants broad management rights within its scope, but Azure Policy enforcement is separate from RBAC. A deny effect blocks the resource creation even when the user has sufficient permissions. The fact that the deployment succeeds once the public IP is removed strongly indicates a policy rule, not a permissions issue.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The policy assignment can apply to the resource group because policy inheritance flows from management group to subscription to resource group.

    Why this is correct

    Azure Policy assignments at a management group or subscription can affect child scopes automatically. That inheritance explains why a resource group deployment can be denied even when the user has access at the resource-group scope. The template change works because it stops violating the inherited policy condition.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • A CanNotDelete lock is the reason the public IP resource cannot be created.

    Why it's wrong here

    A CanNotDelete lock only prevents deletion of locked resources. It does not stop creating a new VM, NIC, or public IP, and it does not explain a policy denial message. This distractor confuses resource protection with compliance enforcement.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question where a resource cannot be deleted and the error message indicates a lock is in place, or where a deployment fails because it tries to delete a locked resource.

  • Assigning Owner on the resource group would automatically bypass the policy denial and allow the template to deploy unchanged.

    Why it's wrong here

    Owner provides full RBAC permissions at the assigned scope, but Azure Policy still evaluates independently. A deny policy remains effective even for highly privileged users unless the policy definition or assignment changes. RBAC elevation does not override policy compliance rules.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This option would be correct if the question stated that the deployment failed due to a resource lock (e.g., CanNotDelete) instead of a policy denial. In that case, assigning Owner would allow the user to remove or override the lock.

  • Moving the VM to another subnet in the same virtual network would remove the inherited policy effect.

    Why it's wrong here

    Policy scope is tied to Azure hierarchy, not to whether a VM uses one subnet or another. Changing the subnet may affect networking, but it does not remove a policy inherited from the management group or subscription. The denial would remain until the policy condition is no longer met.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question described a network security group (NSG) rule blocking traffic, and moving the VM to a different subnet with a different NSG resolved the issue, then this option would be correct.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The AZ-104 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

The Contributor role allows deployments in the resource group, but it cannot override a deny policy inherited from a higher scope.Correct answer

Why this is correct

Contributor grants broad management rights within its scope, but Azure Policy enforcement is separate from RBAC. A deny effect blocks the resource creation even when the user has sufficient permissions. The fact that the deployment succeeds once the public IP is removed strongly indicates a policy rule, not a permissions issue.

A CanNotDelete lock is the reason the public IP resource cannot be created.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A CanNotDelete lock prevents deletion of existing resources, not creation of new ones. The failure is due to a policy denial, not a lock.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question where a resource cannot be deleted and the error message indicates a lock is in place, or where a deployment fails because it tries to delete a locked resource.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse locks with policies, or think that a 'deny' effect is equivalent to a lock, leading them to incorrectly attribute the failure to a CanNotDelete lock.

Assigning Owner on the resource group would automatically bypass the policy denial and allow the template to deploy unchanged.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Assigning the Owner role on the resource group does not automatically bypass Azure Policy denials. Policies are enforced at the Azure Resource Manager level and override any role permissions, including Owner.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This option would be correct if the question stated that the deployment failed due to a resource lock (e.g., CanNotDelete) instead of a policy denial. In that case, assigning Owner would allow the user to remove or override the lock.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may assume that higher privileges like Owner can override any restriction, confusing Azure Policy (which is an explicit deny) with role-based access control or resource locks.

Moving the VM to another subnet in the same virtual network would remove the inherited policy effect.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Moving a VM to another subnet does not affect policy inheritance; policies are assigned to scopes (management group, subscription, resource group) and apply to all resources within that scope regardless of subnet.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question described a network security group (NSG) rule blocking traffic, and moving the VM to a different subnet with a different NSG resolved the issue, then this option would be correct.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse policy inheritance with network-level restrictions, thinking that changing subnets can alter policy applicability.

Analysis generated from the official AZ-104blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is confusing Azure Policy denials with Azure role-based access control (RBAC) or resource locks, leading candidates to incorrectly assume that a higher-privileged role like Owner can override a policy denial, or that a CanNotDelete lock blocks resource creation.

Trap categories for this question

  • Similar concept trap

    A CanNotDelete lock only prevents deletion of locked resources. It does not stop creating a new VM, NIC, or public IP, and it does not explain a policy denial message. This distractor confuses resource protection with compliance enforcement.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Azure Policy uses a deny effect that is evaluated during resource creation via Azure Resource Manager (ARM). The policy engine checks all applicable policy assignments at every scope in the hierarchy (management group → subscription → resource group → resource). Even with Contributor or Owner roles, if a policy with a 'deny' effect is assigned at a higher scope, the deployment is blocked before any role-based access control (RBAC) check occurs. This is a key distinction: RBAC controls who can act, while Azure Policy controls what resources are allowed.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free AZ-104 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Deploy and Manage Azure Compute — This question tests Deploy and Manage Azure Compute — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The Contributor role allows deployments in the resource group, but it cannot override a deny policy inherited from a higher scope. — Option A is correct because the Contributor role grants full management access to resources within the resource group, but it cannot override Azure Policy effects such as 'deny'. Policy inheritance flows from higher scopes (management group, subscription) down to the resource group, and even a Contributor cannot bypass a deny policy assigned at a higher scope. The Bicep deployment fails specifically because the public IP resource violates a policy rule, not because of a lack of permissions on the role itself.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More AZ-104 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This AZ-104 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-104 exam.